摘要
我国董事义务建立于代理制基础上的民事合同与侵权理论,在体系和内容设计方面上深受德国、日本等国家公司法的影响,但是在商事语境下,并没有体现出商事制度中代理的特殊性应用,从商事角度考察,在突出商事活动特别是公司法范畴下代理的特殊性上还有不足,这一现象也多体现于公司法的修改中,英美法系国家董事义务建立在信义义务的基础,更加着眼于突出董事的个人属性。我国未来的立法可在代理制基础上,内嵌信托理论与信义义务,实现董事义务代理框架下的信义优化。
The obligations of directors in China are built on the theory of civil contracts and torts based on the agency system,which is deeply influenced by German andJapanese company law in terms of system.But in the commercial context,the special application of agency in the commercial system has not been reflected.However,from the commercial perspective,there are still deficiencies in highlighting the special nature of agency in commercial activities,especially under the scope of the Company Law.This phenomenon is mostly reflected in the revision of the Company Law.The obligations of directors under Anglo-American law are based on fiduciary duties,with a greater emphasis on highlighting the personal attributes of directors.The future legislation of our country can embed trust theory and fiduciary obligations on the basis of agency system,and achieve the optimization of fiduciary obligations under the framework of director obligation agency.
作者
孙学亮
成朋
Sun Xue-liang;Cheng Peng(Law school,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300314,China)
出处
《天津法学》
2023年第2期57-68,共12页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
董事代理
职务代理
信义义务
信托理论
Director's agent
Job agent
Fiduciary obligations
Trust theory
