摘要
中国阐释学的建构,可从传统中寻到滋养。训诂与义理,是中国儒家阐释传统中两条清晰的路径,千百年来此消彼长,亦有辩证统一。到了集大成之清朝,戴震与章学诚看似针锋相对,其实两人都致力于超越训诂与义理二元对立的阐释模式。章学诚以校雠为方法,建构以史学为中心的阐释思想;戴震以考证为手段,致力于明晰义理。二人在考证之风盛行的乾嘉时期,一隐一显,一者不掩锋芒,直书己意;一者以考证为掩饰,有志闻道,可谓是殊途同归。
The construction of Chinese hermeneutics can be nourished by tradition.Exegesis and righteousness are two clear paths in the interpretation tradition of Chinese Confucianism.They have been changing one another for thousands of years,and there is also a dialectical unity.In the Qing Dynasty,Dai Zhen and Zhang Xuecheng seemed to be diametrically opposed.In fact,both of them were committed to transcending the dualistic interpretation mode of exegesis and righteousness.Zhang Xuecheng took collation as the method to construct the interpretation thought centered on history;Dai Zhen devoted himself to clarifying the meaning by means of textual research.In the Qianjia period,when the wind of textual research prevailed,one of them was hidden and the other was obvious.One of them did not hide his sharp edge and wrote his own thoughts directly;One uses textual research as a cover,and is interested in hearing the truth.It can be said that it is the same goal by different paths.
作者
刘莉莉
LIU Lili(College of Chinese language and Shanxi Literature,Shanxi University,Taiyuan Shanxi 030006,China)
出处
《四川职业技术学院学报》
2023年第5期104-109,共6页
Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College
关键词
阐释学
文史校雠
训诂义理
章学诚
戴震
Hermeneutics
Collation of literature and history
Exegesis
Zhang Xuecheng
Dai zhen
