摘要
近年来,土地用益物权人无证采矿案件频发。通过分析司法实践中的真实案例发现,不同司法机关对于土地用益物权人无证采矿行为如何定性的问题存在较大分歧,实践中对此类行为的定罪量刑较为混乱。从法教义学的角度来说,对于土地用益物权人无证采矿的行为不宜简单认定其仅构成非法采矿罪。如农用地用益物权人无证采矿造成耕地、林地等农用地大量毁损的,其行为同时构成非法占用农用地罪。如土地用益物权人对其所开采矿产资源具有非法占有目的,无证采矿行为同时构成盗窃罪,属于一行为触犯数罪,应当依据想象竞合原理从一重罪处罚。司法机关在处理无证采矿案件过程中应全面评估被告人行为,避免形成无证采矿案件均以非法采矿罪论处的路径依赖。
In recent years,cases of unlicensed mining by land usufruct owners have become frequent.From the doctrinal point of view,different judicial organs have divergent views on how to characterize the unlicensed mining behavior of land usufruct owners,and the conviction and sentencing of such behavior is confusing in practice.It is not appropriate to simply determine that the unlicensed act of mining constitutes an illegal mining crime.If the unlicensed mining of agricultural land by the usufructuary causes massive destruction of agricultural land such as arable land and forest land,the behavior constitutes the crime of illegal occupation of agricultural land.If the owner has the purpose of illegal possession of mineral resources,the unlicensed act also constitutes the crime of theft,which is an act of committing several crimes and should be punished from a felony according to the principle of imaginative competition.In the process of dealing with such cases,the judiciary should comprehensively assess the defendant′s behavior to avoid the path of unlawful mining cases being treated as illegal mining crimes.
作者
钭晓东
肖庚奇
TOU Xiaodong;XIAO Gengqi
出处
《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2023年第5期51-65,118,共16页
Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“加快推进生态治理体系与治理能力现代化研究”(20&ZD091)。
