期刊文献+

高等医学院校科研团队绩效评价实证研究——以首都医科大学为例

Empirical study on performance evaluation of scientific research team in medical university——taking Capital Medical University as an example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 初步建立高等医学院校科研团队绩效评价指标体系,全面客观地评价科研团队绩效水平。方法 引入平衡记分卡理论,应用德尔菲法和层次分析法,确立了由4个一级指标、14个二级指标和29个三级指标构成的高等医学院校科研团队绩效评价指标体系,并且选取了首都医科大学6个处于不同发展阶段的科研团队进行实证。结果 6个团队绩效水平存在明显差距,存在人才培养不足、合作程度不高、社会效益低等问题。由此提出高等医学院校应加大人才培养力度、建立结构合理的科研团队、加强团队内外的合作程度、突出地方的区域特色等建议。结论 平衡计分卡方法适用于医科高等院校科研团队绩效评价。 Objective To establish a preliminary performance evaluation index system for research teams in medical university to comprehensively and objectively evaluate the performance level of research teams.Methods The balanced scorecard theory was introduced in this study,Delphi method and analytic hierarchy method were applied to establish a performance evaluation index system for medical university scientific research teams.The index system consists of 4 firstlevel indicators,14 second-level indicators and 29 third-level indicators,and then we selected 6 scientific research teams for empirical verification.Results There were significant gaps in the performance levels of the six teams.Teams have problems such as insufficient talent training,low degree of cooperation,weak academic influence and low social benefits.In order to solve these problems,it is suggested that medical universities should increase talent training,establish a well-structured scientific research team,strengthen the degree of cooperation inside and outside the team,and highlight local regional characteristics.Conclusion The Balanced Scorecard method is applicable to the performance evaluation of research teams in medical university.
作者 马子寅 侯洁 邵雪梅 吴萍 Ma Ziyin;Hou Jie;Shao Xuemei;Wu Ping(Department of Science and Technology,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China;Academic Affairs Office,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,China)
出处 《医学教育管理》 2023年第5期679-686,共8页 Medical Education Management
关键词 高等医学院校 科研团队 绩效评价 德尔菲法 层次分析法 实证研究 medical university scientific research team performance evaluation Delphi method analytic hierarchy process empirical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献103

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部