期刊文献+

“儿童哲学”作为哲学“回到柏拉图”的根本路径如何可能 被引量:1

How is“Philosophy for Children”Possible as the Fundamental Path of Philosophy“Back to Plato”
原文传递
导出
摘要 李普曼所奠基的儿童哲学是为了弥合时代中教育与哲学的分离而提出的教育变革,是对杜威所提出的“哲学—教育”一体化问题的推进。二人虽在儿童哲学教育的实践问题上有很大的分歧,但他们都赞同“回到柏拉图”。儿童哲学即是回归“哲学—教育”一体的教化本原的努力。深度反思儿童哲学必须回到柏拉图所奠基的西方哲学的源头处,重新思考“哲学—教育”的理论与实践问题。中国儿童哲学的发展不仅是要处理好儿童哲学与蒙学的关系,而且这一问题本身涉及古今中西视域中对未来“哲学—教育”的整体性构型。 The Philosophy for Children founded by Lipman is an educational reform aimed to bridge the separation of education and philosophy,and it is the promotion of the integration of philosophy and education proposed by Dewey.Although they have great differences on the practice of children s philosophy education,they both concur with the idea of“Back to Plato”.Philosophy for Children is an effort to return to the integration of“philosophy-education”as the arche of Paideia.Deeply reflection on the Philosophy for Children must go back to the source of Western philosophy founded by Plato and rethink the theory and practice of“philosophy-education”.The development of Chinese Philosophy for Children needs to correctly deal with the relationship between Philosophy for Children and Traditional Initiation Education;meanwhile,the problem itself involves the whole future eidos of the“philosophy-education”in the perspectives of ancient-modern and Chinese-Western.
作者 罗兴刚 刘鹤丹 LUO Xinggang;LIU Hedan
出处 《中国人民大学教育学刊》 CSSCI 2023年第6期164-176,共13页 Renmin University of China Education Journal
基金 国家社科基金后期资助项目“柏拉图的教化研究”(项目编号19FZXB029)的研究成果
关键词 儿童哲学 李普曼 杜威 哲学教育 回到柏拉图 Philosophy for Children Lipman Dewey Philosophy Education Back to Plato
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Michael Hand & Carrie Winstanley (ed.).Philosophy in Schools [ M ]. New York: Con- tinuum ,2008. xi, xii-x ,6-10.
  • 2李普曼.哲学探究[M].太原:山西教育出版社,1997.4,2,1,3.
  • 3Matthew Lipman,Ann Sharp & Fredrich Oscanyan.Philosophy in the class- room [ M ]. Philadelphia, PA : Temple University Press, 1980. 3,4,25-26,189-190,33-36.
  • 4Matthew Lipman. Natasha: Vygotskian dialogues [M. New York: Teachers College Press, 1996. xiv.
  • 5Matthew Lipman. Philosophy for Children's Debt to Dewey[A]. Michael Taylor,elmut Sehreier, and Paulo Ghiraldelli,Jr. (ed.). Pragmatism,Education,and Children: International Philosophical Per-spectives [ C ]. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2008.143-151.
  • 6Matthew Lipman. Thinking in Education [ M ]. New York :Cambridge University Press, 2003. 12,15.
  • 7Ann Margaret Sharp & Ronald F. Reed. Studies in Philosophy for Children:Harry Stot- flemeier's Discovery[M ]. Philadelphia :Temple University Press, 1992. xiv, 5-7.
  • 8Nancy Vansieheghem and David Kennedy (ed.). Philosophy for children in transition : prob- lems and prospects [ M ]. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.3,7.
  • 9Matthew Lipman. Philosophy goes to school [ M ]. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988. vii,20.
  • 10Eulalia Bosch. An Interview with Matthew Lipman[J].Analytic Teaching, 1998,18 (1):1-4.

共引文献21

同被引文献18

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部