摘要
随着公益诉讼体系的不断发展,刑事附带民事公益诉讼开始向数字空间拓展,并逐渐适用于多种类型的信息网络犯罪案件,其所具有的积量性、利益交叉性以及中介性特征使得此类案件与传统公益诉讼案件类型在公共利益判断、刑民对应关系以及诉讼请求类型与执行方面均存在一定差异。对此,刑事附带民事公益诉讼的制度建设需要在坚持其“附带”地位的前提下,厘清其公益性与刑事诉讼公益性的差异,并在此基础上基于涉信息网络犯罪案件特性,建立起刑事诉讼与刑事附带民事公益诉讼在起诉主体、被告人范围以及案由方面的适当的对应关系,同时就赔偿损失、停止侵害、消除危险等诉讼请求做必要的适应数字治理的制度调适。
With the development of the public interest litigation system,criminal incidental civil public interest litigation has begun to expand to the digital space,and is gradually applicable to various types of cybercrimes.The characteristics of cumulativeness,intersecting interests,and intermediation of these cases introduce distinctions from traditional public interest litigation cases in terms of public interest judgment,criminal-civil procedural correspondence,and the type and execution of litigation claims.Therefore,the system construction of criminal incidental civil public interest litigation necessitates the clarification of differences between the public interest and that of the criminal litigation on the premise of adhering to its"incidental"status.In addition,based on the characteristics of information-related cybercrime cases,it is imperative to establish appropriate correspondence between criminal proceedings and criminal public interest litigation in terms of the prosecuting party,the scope of defendant,and the cause of action,and meanwhile make necessary adjustments to digital governance for litigation claims such as compensation for losses,cessation of infringement,and elimination of danger.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2023年第6期255-266,共12页
Journal Of CUPL
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“数字正义视阈下刑事审判程序数字化法治路径研究”(项目批准号:23BFX142)的阶段性成果。
关键词
刑事附带民事公益诉讼
信息网络犯罪
公共利益
刑民对应
诉讼请求
criminal incidental civil public interest litigation
cybercrimes
public interest
criminal and civil procedural coordination
litigation claims
