摘要
唐宋以来,文献记载中的“铜梁”“铜梁县”“铜梁山”“小铜梁山”名实含混不清。梳理历朝有关记载,唐铜梁县得名应该源于小铜梁山,唐代铜梁山与小铜梁山实为两山,两宋以后总体趋势由两山逐渐混为一山,致使铜梁县得名说法混乱繁杂。实际上,在山岳名实关系复杂的表象背后,暗含的是对“铜梁”山名资源的借用。“铜梁”拥有文学、旅游、宗教等价值,从而具有丰厚的山名资源。因此,明清以后,人们出于浓厚的乡土情怀,通过模糊山岳名实、虚构山岳归属、嫁接山岳文本的方式重新建构铜梁县地名。
The names and facts of“Tongliang”,“Tongliang County”,“Tongliang Mountain”and“Xiao Tongliang Mountain”are obscure in literature records since the Tang and Song Dynasties.According to the relevant records of the past dynasties,Tongliang County in the Tang Dynasty should be named after Xiao Tongliang Mountain.Then Tongliang Mountain and Xiao Tongliang Mountain were actually two mountains.After the Song Dynasty,the two mountains were gradually deemed as the same mountain,resulting in the confusion and complexity in the naming of Tongliang County.In fact,the superficial complex relationship between the names and the facts of mountains implies the borrowing of“Tongliang”mountain name resources.“Tongliang”contains abundant mountain name resources due to its value in literature,tourism,religion and so on.Therefore,after the Ming and Qing Dynasties,the people reconstruct the naming of Tongliang County,out of strong local feelings,by some methods such as blurring mountain name,fabricating the mountain affiliation and grafting mountain texts.
作者
聂炜鑫
Nie Weixin(Institute of Historical Geography,Southwest University,Chongqing,China,400715)
出处
《地方文化研究》
2023年第4期35-42,共8页
Local Culture Research
基金
2021年重庆市民政局委托项目“重庆市标准地名志”阶段性成果。
关键词
铜梁山
小铜梁山
铜梁县
名实关系
山名资源
Tongliang Mountain
Xiao Tongliang Mountain
Tongliang County
The Relationship between names and facts
Mountain name resources
