摘要
假如于行政程序中得强迫公民提交犯罪证据,并在对其进行的刑事追诉中使用,不自证己罪原则便不过一纸空文,是以行政程序领域亦有适用不自证己罪原则之必要。至于适用之方式,相较而言,证据运用禁止的方案最能够平衡兼顾国家行政利益的保障与个人不自证己罪的自由,可作为我国未来法制改进之借镜,但首先应明确证据运用禁止的效力范围。
The privilege against self-incrimination is useless if an individual can be forced to give evidence of his guilt and use it to charge him with a crime in administrative proceedings,so it is necessary to apply the principle of against self-incrimination in administrative proceedings.As for how it should be applied,the solution of evidence prohibition is the one that best balances the administrative interests and the citizens’freedom from self-incrimination,it can serve as a model for future legal reforms in our country,but the first step is to determine the scope of the effect of the evidenceprohibition.
作者
徐孜男
XU Zinan(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处
《湖北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2024年第1期68-76,共9页
Journal of Hubei Normal University（Philosophy and Social Science）
关键词
不自证己罪原则
沉默权
行政协力义务
证据禁止
the principle of against self-incrimination
the right to remain silent
administrative cooperation obligation
evidence prohibition
