摘要
社会企业作为一种兼顾经济与社会双重价值的组织形式,是推动实现共同富裕的新兴力量。相关政策的出台将会缓解社会企业普遍面临的合法性困境。由此,以当前出台的18份政策文件为对象,基于政策工具分析框架进行了文本分析。研究发现:三大政策工具占比相当:需求型(38.6%)、环境型(31.2%)、供给型(30.2%)。政策工具内部结构不够合理,在供给型政策工具中,基础设施、资源共享、组织建设节点占比较少;在需求型工具中,社会参与、政府购买节点占比过少;在环境型工具中,法规规范在所有二级节点占比最高,但财务金融、税收制度、择优扶持占比过少。另外,结合地区政策计量结果和实际发展情况,进一步对北京、成都和顺德三地的典型模式展开了分析。据此,提出满足市场需要,补齐政策短板;制定统一标准;警惕“各自为政”;明确负责机构,交流发展经验等建议。
As a unique form of organization that takes into account both economic and social values,social enterprise is an emerging force to promote the realization of common wealth.The introduction of relevant policies will alleviate the legitimacy dilemma commonly faced by social enterprises.Therefore,this paper analyzed the 18 policy documents issued at present,and analyzed the texts based on the policy tool analysis framework.It is found that:the three major policy tools account for a similar proportion,of which the demand-based policy tools account for the most,followed by environmental policy tools,and the supply-based is the least;the internal structure of the policy tools is unreasonable,in the supply-based policy tools,the nodes of infrastructure,resource sharing,and organization construction account for less,in the demand-based tools,the nodes of social participation and government purchase account for too little,and in the environmental tools,the regulations and norms account for the highest proportion of the nodes in all the secondary nodes account for the highest percentage,but financial and financial,tax system,and merit-based support account for too little.Combining the results of regional policy measurement and actual development,further research on typical development models reveals that:the Beijing model supports social enterprises in policy documents late and mainly in the environmental and demand types;Chengdu involves all policy tools,but still has less support in the direction of financial investment and merit-based support;Shunde District in Guangzhou has strong government support,but its own capacity is still insufficient.Accordingly,it is proposed to meet the market needs,make up for the shortcomings of the policy,formulate unified standards,and guard against“doing things in their own way”,and clarify the responsible organizations and exchange the development experience,and so on.
作者
牛楠
石皓喆
孔畅
王金晖
Niu Nan;Shi Haoche;Kong Chang;Wang Jinhui(College of Management,Hebei University,Baoding 071000,China;College of Economics and Management,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063210,China)
出处
《科技创业月刊》
2024年第1期64-69,共6页
Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science & Technology
基金
河北省社会科学发展研究课题(20220303036)。
