摘要
目的分析桥接组合式内固定系统治疗锁骨骨折的临床效果。方法选取2016年1月—2020年12月本院收治的84例锁骨骨折患者为研究对象,按照不同治疗方案随机分组。其中,对照组(42例)采取常规术式治疗,实验组(42例)采取桥接组合式内固定系统治疗,对比分析两组的临床效果。结果实验组手术时间、骨折愈合时间,与对照组比较更短,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组并发症发生率对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3个月,实验组疼痛、运动范围及功能评分高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组骨折复位分级高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月,实验组Constant-Murley评分更高,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论锁骨骨折患者应用桥接组合式内固定系统治疗有效性提高。
Objective To analyze clinical effect of bridging combination internal fixation system in treatment of clavicle fractures.Methods The paper chose 84 patients with clavicle fractures from January 2016 to December 2020,and divided them into different treatment groups randomly.Control group was treated with routine surgical treatment,while experimental group with bridging combination internal fixation system treatment.Clinical effect was analyzed.Results Experimental group had shorter surgical time of(50.98±10.43)minutes and fracture healing tim e of(14.19±1.23)weeks than control group(P<0.05).Comparison of complications incidence between two groups showed(P>0.05).Three months after surgery,pain(28.49±3.11),range of motion(20.06±3.54),and functional scores(24.44±3.29)in experimental group were higher than control group,with difference,P<0.05.Fracture reduction grading of experimental group was higher than control group(P<0.05).Three months after surgery,Constant-Murley scores in experimental group were higher(P<0.05).Conclusion Bridging combination internal fixation system can improve treatment effect of clavicle fractures.
作者
许海云
安晋宇
樊友亮
XU Haiyun;AN Jinyu;FAN Youliang(Orthopedics Department,Changzhou City the Fourth People's Hospital,Changzhou,Jiangsu 213032)
出处
《智慧健康》
2023年第27期199-202,共4页
Smart Healthcare
基金
常州市卫健委科技项目《桥接系统点式接触固定治疗四肢长管状骨骨折有限元力学分析及临床疗效研究》(项目编号:WZ202115)。
关键词
桥接组合式内固定系统
锁骨骨折
临床效果
Bridge combination internal fixation system
Clavicular fracture
Clinical effect
