摘要
目的:通过本院呼吸机使用情况的数据分析,整合现有资源重新分配呼吸机,提高全院呼吸机使用率,为相关部门在购置决策和管理呼吸机实践提供依据。方法:通过医院信息系统(HIS)导出本院2020年12月1日~2021年11月30日呼吸机使用情况(作为对照组)并分析数据。根据数据分析情况对全院呼吸机按“全局规划、分散管理、统筹安排”的管理原则,重新整合呼吸机资源。实施整合资源后的时间段(2021年12月1日~2022年11月30日)作为观察组,对比两组的各科室呼吸机开机率情况、呼吸机“无临床科室间互借”率及医护人员的使用满意度。结果:对照组的各科室均台开机率平均值为8.31h/台/d,观察组的各科室均台开机率平均值为9.58h/台/d观察组的设备开机率明显高于对照组。对照组的“无临床科室间互借”率84.38%(308/365),观察组为96.71%(353/365),显著高于对照组(P<0.05);对照组设备使用满意度为84%(168/200),观察组设备使用满意度为94%(188/200),显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对医疗设备使用情况分析,并指导医疗设备采购及设备使用管理,可以有效避免临床公用类设备的各科室开机率差异较大情况,减少设备闲置。
Objective:Through the data analysis of the use of ventilators in our hospital,consolidating existing resources and reallocating ventilators,improve the utilization rate of ventilators in the whole hospital,and provide a basis for relevant departments in the purchase decision and management practice of ventilators.Methods:The use of ventilator in our hospital from December 1,2020 to November 30,2021(as a control group)was exported through HIS system and the data were analyzed.According to the data analysis,ventilator resources of the whole hospital were re-integrated according to the management principle of“global planning,decentralized management and overall arrangement”.The period after resource integration(from December 1,2021 to November 30,2022)will be used as the observation group.The utilization rate of ventilator in each department,the rate of“no interdepartmental loan”of ventilator and the satisfaction of medical staff were compared between the two groups.Results:The average utilization rate of each department in the control group was 8.31(h×s-1/d),and the average utilization rate of each department in the observation group was 9.58(h×s-1/d).The equipment utilization rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group.The rate of“no clinical inter-department loan”was 84.38%(308/365)in the control group and 96.71%(353/365)in the observation group,which was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The satisfaction rate of equipment use in the control group was 84%(168/200),while in the observation group it was 94%(188/200),which was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The large difference in the opening rate of clinical public equipment in different departments,idle equipment rate can be effectively avoided by analyzing the use of medical equipment and guiding the purchase and use management of medical equipment,which is a management mode that can be widely promoted in clinical public equipment.
作者
符增
温燕清
申芳瑜
王凌
钟晨
FU Zeng;WEN Yan-qing;SHEN Fang-yu;WANG Ling;ZHONG Chen(Equipment Consumables Department,Ganzhou People’s Hospital,Jiangxi Ganzhou 341000)
出处
《中国医疗器械信息》
2024年第1期151-154,共4页
China Medical Device Information
基金
江西省卫生健康委科技计划资助项目(项目编号:20227319)
赣州市指导性科技计划(项目编号:20222ZDX8172)。
