摘要
作为合宪性审查中的关键环节,宪法解释既需要从程序方面进行规范,更需要从内容方面进行规范。原旨主义作为一种追寻宪法原意、限制解释裁量空间的解释方法,与我国在法律解释中注重符合立法原意的传统具有一定的适配性。基于维护中国宪法规范稳定性、增强宪法解释统一性和促进宪法学自主性等原因,也有必要在宪法解释中将其作为解释方法之一进行引入,探索和发展中国的原旨解释路径。未来的宪法解释、合宪性审查以及其他国家机关进行宪法判断时,需将探求宪法原意作为宪法解释的重要环节,特别是在合宪性审查的语境下用于探寻宪法规定、宪法原则和宪法精神的含义;除宪法文本外,宪法序言和制宪修宪历史文献材料是探究宪法原旨的主要渊源。
Constitutional interpretation,a critical element in constitutional review mechanism,requires both procedural and substantive regulation.Originalism,an interpretative approach aimed at discerning and understanding a constitution's original meaning and limiting interpretative discretion,aligns with China's traditional focus on legislative intent in legal interpretation.Given the necessity to preserve the stability of China's constitutional norms,standardize constitutional interpretation,and foster China's own constitutional jurisprudence,adopting originalism as one of the interpretative methods is essential.This approach involves exploring and cultivating a unique path for originalist interpretation in China.In future constitutional practices,seeking the original meaning of the constitution should be recognized as a vital facet of constitutional interpretation.This is crucial for clarifying the significance of constitutional provisions,principles and ethos.For uncovering the original meaning of the Chinese Constitution,primary sources should not only include the constitutional text but also the Preamble and historical documents pertaining to the Constitution's making and amending.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第1期63-83,共21页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“大数据、人工智能背景下的公安法治建设研究”(项目编号:19ZDA165)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
原旨主义
立法原意
合宪性审查
宪法解释
Originalism
Legislative Intent
Constitutional Review
Constitutional Interpretation
