摘要
“斯密问题”由德国历史学派提出并在学术界引发热议,主要形成了矛盾论、统一论和依情境讨论三种观点。随着时代的发展,“斯密问题”在理论层面表现为行为主体“利己”与“顾他”间的矛盾,现实层面表现为道德建设与经济发展失衡的非偶然性。这两个新的表征成为各国亟待解决的问题。根据桑塔费学派思想,各主体的行为选择不单出于“顾己”动机,还受环境、文化、习俗等影响产生“顾他”动机。要解决这一问题必须兼顾外在力量推动和内在动力驱动,形成“有效市场、有为政府、有爱社会”是破解机理的核心所在。党的二十大进一步指出完善三次分配的重要性,体现出构建有爱社会对推进共同富裕具有极强的潜在力。
The “DAS ADAM SMITH PROBLEM” was put forward by the school of German history and caused heated discussion in academic circles,mainly forming the three viewpoints of the theory of contradiction,the theory of unification and the discussion according to the situation.With the times advancing,the “DAS ADAM SMITH PROBLEM” is manifested as the contradiction between “Self-Interested” preference and “Other-Regarding” preference in theory,and the non-accidental imbalance between moral construction and economic development in reality.These two new characteristics become urgent problems for all countries to solve.According to Santa Fe Institute Economists of thought,the behavior choice of each subject is not only motivated by "Self-Interested",but also “Other-Regarding” generated under the influence of the environment,culture and custom.In order to solve this problem,we must take into account both advancement of external forces and internal driving forces,and the formation of “efficient market,capable government and loving society” is the core of the solution mechanism.The 20th CPC National Congress further pointed out the importance of improving the tertiary distribution,reflecting the strong potential of building a loving society to promote common prosperity.
作者
刘一方
LIU Yifang(Faculty of Economics,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China)
出处
《经济论坛》
2024年第2期27-38,共12页
Economic Forum
基金
国家自然科学基金资助青年项目“技术、偏好共同演化下的产业政策动态调适机理研究”(71804100)
教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金项目“政策叙事的量化识别、扩散机理与效度提升路径研究”(22YJCZH133)
山西省哲学社会科学规划课题“新发展格局下山西在中部地区争先崛起的创新路径研究:基于流量枢纽建设的视角”(2022YD099)
山西省研究生教育创新项目“统一大市场中产业政策效应的‘二重性悖论’:表征、演化机理与破解路径”(2022Y510)。
关键词
斯密问题
桑塔费学派
顾他偏好
共同富裕
第三次分配
“DAS ADAM SMITH PROBLEM”
Santa Fe Institute Economists
Other-Regarding Preferences
Common Prosperity
The tertiary distribution
