期刊文献+

对比MRI与超声对唇腭裂的产前诊断价值:Meta分析

Comparison of MRI and ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of fetal cleft lip and palate:a Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:采用Meta分析比较磁共振成像(MRI)与超声(US)对唇腭裂产前诊断的临床应用价值。方法:检索Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、万方、维普、中国知网及中国生物医学文献等数据库,查找比较MRI及US对胎儿唇腭裂产前诊断的相关研究,检索时限为2000年1月至2022年12月。计算汇总诊断比值比、灵敏度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、受试者工作特性曲线下面积(AUC)、验前验后概率及95%CI。结果:纳入文献6篇,共235例。MRI和US合并灵敏度分别为0.98(95%CI:0.94~0.99)和0.70(95%CI:0.35~0.91),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MRI和US合并特异度分别为0.84(95%CI:0.76~0.90)和0.59(95%CI:0.21~0.89),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MRI的AUC显著高于US的AUC(0.98 vs.0.84,P<0.05)。结论:对于胎儿唇腭裂的产前诊断,MRI较US诊断效能更高,可作为产前US诊断的首要补充方法。 Objective:To use Meta-analysis to compare magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)with ultrasound(ultrasound,US)for prenatal diagnosis of fetal cleft lip and palate.Methods:Embase,PubMed,Web of Science,Cochrane Library,Wanfang,Weipu,CNKI and Chinese Biomedical Literature were searched to find all relevant studies comparing MRI and US for prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate in fetuses,and the search period was from January 2000 to December 2022,meanwhile,the references of the included articles were reviewed.Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed,and Stata 17.0 was used for Meta-analysis.Pooled diagnostic odds ratio(DOR),sensitivity(SEN),specificity(SPE),positive likelihood ratio(+LR),negative likelihood ratio(-LR),area under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC),a priori posterior probability and 95%CI were calculated.Calculation of the Z statistic.Results:Six articles with 235 cases were included.MRI combined sensitivity vs.US combined sensitivity was[0.98(95%CI:0.94-0.99)vs.0.70(95%CI:0.35-0.91),P<0.05].MRI combined specificity vs.US combined specificity was[0.84(95%CI:0.76-0.90)vs.0.59(95%CI:0.21-0.89),P<0.05].The AUC of MRI was significantly higher than that of US(0.98 vs.0.84,P<0.05).Conclusion:For prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate in fetuses,MRI has higher diagnostic efficacy than US.Us is the method of choice for fetal cleft lip and palate screening,and MRI examination can be used as the first complementary method for the diagnosis when the diagnosis of cleft palate is unfavorable or cannot be made definitively.
作者 王文轩 母其文 张利平 李维 张福洲 WANG Wenxuan;MU Qiwen;ZAHNG Liping;LI Wei;ZHANG Fuzhou(Department of Imaging,the Second Clinical Medical College of North Sichuan Medical College/Nanchong Central Hospital,Nanchong 637000,China;The Second Clinical Medical College of North Sichuan Medical College/Nanchong Prenatal Diagnosis Center,Nanchong 637000,China;Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,the Second Clinical Medical College of North Sichuan Medical College/Nanchong Central Hospital,Nanchong 637000,China)
出处 《东南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2024年第1期19-24,共6页 Journal of Southeast University(Medical Science Edition)
基金 川北医学院2023年度四川省基层卫生事业发展研究中心资助项目(SWFZ23-Y-46)。
关键词 胎儿 唇腭裂 产前诊断 磁共振成像 超声 META分析 fetus cleft lip and palate prenatal diagnosis magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献90

共引文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部