摘要
作为档案安全刑法保障的“最后防线”,档案犯罪刑罚具有遏制和预防犯罪的重要功能。考察中国裁判文书网公布的14份档案犯罪裁判文书发现,档案犯罪刑罚总体呈现犯罪追诉率低、适用罪名集中、量刑畸轻、缓刑比例大、犯罪人再犯率高等特征,难以有效惩戒和预防档案犯罪行为。究其主要缘由,既有档案犯罪刑罚种类单一的因素,也有档案犯罪量刑标准宽泛等原因。建议通过立法增设档案犯罪财产刑和资格刑、统一档案犯罪量刑标准、规范档案犯罪缓刑适用等方式,提升档案犯罪刑罚质效。
As the"last line of defense"for the criminal law protection of archival security,the penalty for archival crimes has an important function of containing and preventing crimes.Examining the 14 archival crime judgment documents published on China Judgments Online,the overall punishment for archival crimes is characterized by low criminal prosecution rate,concentrated applicable charges,unusually light sentencing,large proportion of probation,and high recurrence rate of offenders,making it difficult to effectively punish and prevent archival crimes.The main reason is the single type of punishment for archival crimes,as well as the broad sentencing standards for archival crimes.It is recommended to improve the quality and efficiency of punishment for archival crimes through legislation,including adding property and qualification penalties for archival crimes,unifying sentencing standards for archival crimes,and standardizing the application of probation for archival crimes.
作者
蒋云飞
袁奎
Jiang Yunfei;Yuan Kui(Chongqing Institute of Economic and Social Development,Party School of the CPC Chongqing Municipal Committee,Chongqing 400041;East China University of Political Science and Law,Post Doctoral Mobile Station,Shanghai 200042)
出处
《档案与建设》
2024年第2期60-66,共7页
Archives & Construction
基金
国家档案局科技项目“档案开放审核尽职免责制度研究”(项目编号:2023-R-010)
重庆市法学会第三期法学研究课题“未成年人个人信息保护实证考察与制度完善研究”(项目编号:CFH2022C07)阶段性研究成果。
关键词
档案犯罪
犯罪预防
刑罚功能
裁判文书
Archival Crimes
Crime Prevention
Penalty Function
Judgment Documents
