摘要
推论语义学的基本观点是,概念实践是一种给出和索取理由的语言游戏,特定表达的意义在相关推论中得以阐明,掌握一个表达并使之清晰,就是掌握该表达在相关语言游戏中的推论角色。根据这一理论,法律表达的意义也由其在法律实践中的推论角色所决定。作为一种探究法律表达之意义的活动,法律解释既不是对法律文本之先在意义或立法者原意的还原,也不是完全依赖于具体情境的创造,而是一种寻求法律话语之最佳解释的推论过程。最佳解释的正确性取决于解释实践中的推论规则,而这些规则来源于解释实践背后的“相互承认模型”。由此可见,法律解释是一种受规则指引的推论实践,法律规范之意义的客观性决定于这一实践的规范结构。
The basic ideas of inferential semantics are that conceptual practice is a language game of giving and asking for reasons,that the meaning of a particular expression is elucidated in an inference,and that to master an expression so as to make it explicit is to master the inferential role of that expression in the relevant language game.According to this theory,the meaning of legal expressions is decided by the inferential role it plays in legal practice.As an activity of inquiry into the meaning of legal expressions,legal interpretation is neither a tracing back process of the preexisting meaning for legal text or original intention of the legislators,nor a creative activity according to specific context.It is an inferential process seeking the best interpretation of the legal discourse,and the correctness of the best interpretive depends on the inferential rules of the interpretive practice,which derive from “the model of reciprocal recognition” behind the practice of legal interpretation.Therefore,legal interpretation is a practice regulated by rules,and the objectivity of the meaning of legal norms is determined by the normative structure of this practice.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第1期182-202,共21页
Law and Social Development
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于推论主义语义学的法律解释理论研究”(19YJC820051)
深圳市哲学社会科学规划课题“科技进步对法律发展的影响研究”(SZ2022B021)的阶段性成果。
关键词
法律解释
推论语义学
推论主义
布兰顿
Legal Interpretation
Inferential Semantics
Pragmatics
Inferentialism
Robert B.Brandom
