期刊文献+

心肺复苏主动强化策略对院前救治措施的影响分析

Impact of the active reinforcement strategy for cardiopulmonary resuscitation on prehospital treatment measures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 建立心肺复苏主动强化策略,评估该策略效果。方法 将院前急救团队分成传统心肺复苏(cardiopulmonary resuscitation,CPR)组与CPR主动强化组,利用视频和小程序记录急救过程。2021年6月-2021年12月,收集到传统CPR组49个病例与CPR主动强化组51个病例,统计抢救时间、按压时间、除颤时间、机械按压设备安装时间、首次肾上腺素使用时间以及气管插管时间等指标,比较两组的差异。结果 CPR主动强化组的前10 min胸外按压比例[69.67(61.75,75.33)%]和高级气道建立比例(84.3%)高于传统CPR组[46.0(31.5,53.5)%和61.2%],差异有统计学意义(均P <0.05)。两组在机械按压使用率、肾上腺素使用率、复苏机械安装用时、救治开始至复苏机械安装完成用时、救治开始至首次肾上腺素使用时间、救治开始至高级气道建立完成用时等方面差异均无统计学意义(均P> 0.05)。在心肺复苏结局方面,传统CPR组和CPR主动强化组院前自主循环恢复率分别为38.8%(19/49)和35.3%(18/51),差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论 实施CPR主动强化策略能明显提高院前心搏骤停患者的前10 min胸外按压比例,视频回顾与急救措施登记分析能有效提高心肺复苏的质量,值得进一步推广。 Objective To establish an active reinforcement strategy for cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)and evaluate its effect.Methods The pre-hospital emergency teams were divided into the conventional CPR group and the CPR active reinforcement group,and the rescue process was recorded by video and mini-program.From June 2021 to December 2021,the data of 49 cases in the conventional CPR group and 51 cases in the CPR active reinforcement group were collected,and indicators such as rescue time,compression time,defibrillation time,mechanical compression device installation time,first adrenaline use time,and tracheal intubation time were calculated and compared between the two groups.Results The chest compression fraction[69.67(61.75,75.33)%]and advanced airway establishment rate(84.3%)in the first 10 minutes in the CPR active reinforcement group were higher than those in the conventional CPR group[46.0(31.5,53.5)%and 61.2%],and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the cases in two groups in terms of mechanical compression use rate,adrenaline use rate,rescue mechanical installation time,time from rescue start to rescue mechanical installation completion,time from rescue start to first adrenaline use,time from rescue start to advanced airway establishment completion,etc.(P>0.05).In terms of CPR outcome,the pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation(ROSC)rates in the conventional CPR group and the CPR active reinforcement group were 38.8%(19/49)and 35.3%(18/51),respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions The implementation of the CPR active reinforcement strategy can significantly improve the chest compression fraction of pre-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the first 10 minutes,and the video review and rescue measures registration analysis can effectively improve the quality of CPR,which is worth further promotion.
作者 李明华 许萍 叶继 张琳 董雪洁 孙冬冰 阮婕 刘佳慧 LI Minghua;XU Ping;YE Ji;ZHANG Lin;DONG Xuejie;SUN Dongbing;RUAN Jie;LIU Jiahui(Department of Science and Education,Shanghai Medical Emergency Center,Shanghai 200233,China;Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Public Health,Shanghai 200025,China;Peking University School of Public Health,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《职业卫生与应急救援》 2024年第1期76-79,共4页 Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue
基金 上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项(201940015)。
关键词 心肺复苏 主动强化策略 院外心脏骤停 胸外按压比例 院前救治 cardiopulmonary resuscitation active reinforcement strategy out-of-hospital cardiac arrest chest compression fraction pre-hospital treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1422
  • 2朱英,黄淮,颜景华,程谷,周琪,马卫东,王者奇,许沛.心肺复苏后多器官功能障碍综合征危险因素和预后分析[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(8):1048-1050. 被引量:23
  • 3Vaillancourt C, Lui A, De Maio VJ, et al. Socioeconomic statusinfluences by stander CPR and survival rates for out-of-hospitalcardiac arrest victims [ J ]. Resuscitation,2008,79 (3) : 417-423.
  • 4Kayser RG, Omato JP, Peberdy MA, et al. Cardiac arrest in theEmergency Department : a report from the National Registry ofCardiopulmonary Resuscitation [ J ]. Resuscitation,2008,78 (2):151-160.
  • 5Nolan JP, Neumar RW, Adrie C, et al. Post-cardiac arrestsyndrome : epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, andprognostication. A ScientificStatement from the InternationalLiaison Committee on Resuscitation ; the American HeartAssociation EmergencyCardiovascular Care Committee ; theCouncil on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia ; the CouncilonCardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care ; the Councilon Clinical Cardiology; the Council on Stroke [ J ]. Resuscitation,2008,79 (3):350-379.
  • 6Idris AH, Becker LB,Omato JP, et al. Utstein-style guidelinesfor uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research.A statement forhealthcare professionals from a Task Force of the American HeartAssociation, the American College of Emergency Physicians,the American College of Cardiology, the European ResuscitationCouncil, the Heart and StrokeFoundation of Canada, the Instituteof Critical Care Medicine, the Safar Center for ResuscitationResearch,and theSociety for Academic Emergency Medicine [ J ].Resuscitation, 1996,33 (1) : 69-84.
  • 7Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB,et al. Definitions for sepsis andorgan failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapiesin sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee.American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical CareMedicine [ J ]. Chest, 1992,101 (6): 1644-1655.
  • 8Drezner JA,Toresdahl BG,Rao AL,et al. Outcomes from suddencardiac arrest in US high schools : a 2-year prospective study fromthe National Registry for AED Use in Sports [ J ] ? Br J SportsMed,2013,47 (18) : 1179-1183.
  • 9Husain S, Eisenberg M. Police AED programs : a systematic reviewand meta-analysis [ J ]. Resuscitation, 2013,84 ( 9) : 1184-1191.
  • 10Niskanen M,Kari A,Halonen P. Five-year survival after intensivecare-comparison of 12,180 patients with the general population.Finnish ICU Study Group [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 1996,24 ( 12):1962-1967.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部