摘要
意定代理人单方背信的代理行为系有权代理,属于代理权滥用。通说对单方背信代理行为效力采“无权代理说”,忽视了代理人单方背信事实的隐蔽性,效力待定模式与实际利益状态存在罅隙。为纠正被代理人与相对人的利益失衡,应当类推适用《民法典》第151条显失公平制度,以可撤销模式填补第164条第1款之法律漏洞。意定代理人单方背信的代理行为原则上有效,由被代理人承担交易风险。被代理人否定单方背信代理之拘束力,则应证明因代理人背信受有不合理损害、相对人明知或背信具有客观显见性、代理人背信之故意,并在法定期间内行使撤销权。
The act of unilateral breach of trust by an entrusted agent still constitutes authorized agency,which is an abuse of agency power.It is generally said that the effectiveness of agency for unilateral breach of trust adopts“the theory of unauthorized agency”,but it ignores the concealment of unilateral breach of trust by the agent,and the undetermined effectiveness model is not coordinated with the actual state of interests.In order to correct the imbalance of interests between principal and counterparty the system of unconscionability in Article 151 of the Civil Code should be applied by analogy,and the legal loophole in the first paragraph of Article 164 should be filled through a revocable model.When the entrusted agent unilaterally breaches the trust,the act of agency is generally effective and the principal bears the transaction risk.If the principal wishes to deny the binding effect of the agency,it should be proven that the unreasonable damage suffered due to the agent's breach of trust,the agent's intentional breach of trust,and the breach of trust is known to the counterparty or has objective visibility.Moreover,the principal should exercise the right of revocation within the statutory period.
出处
《南大法学》
CSSCI
2024年第2期142-156,共15页
NanJing University Law Journal
基金
吉林省社科基金重大项目(2023ZD1)
2023年吉林大学研究生创新研究计划项目(2023CX024)的阶段性成果。
关键词
意定代理
代理权滥用
单方背信
无权代理
显失公平
Entrusted Agency
Abuse of Agency Power
Unilateral Breach of Trust
Unauthorized Agency
Unconscionability
