摘要
在中国与土耳其的交往中,涉疆事宜是极易引起分歧却又绕不开的话题。2019—2022年间土耳其两大主流英文媒体《自由报》和《晨报》的涉疆报道在数量、议题、话语等方面都存在着一定的差异。通过已建立的两个语料库在主题词和三大核心词China/Chinese、Xinjiang、Uighur(s)的扩展意义单位的分析表明,两大媒体关注的议题主要聚焦于新疆的人权状况,传递出明显的消极语义韵。其表达对华成见所采用的方式主要有:强化维吾尔族人的种族与宗教属性;污名化新疆地区的“教培中心”;把医疗、教育、文化等议题政治化;使用消极语言。这与土耳其的“双泛”思想和其在中东与中亚的政治利益是一致的。但我们相信,随着中土两国关系的不断深化,土耳其媒体的意识形态和政治站位也将随之调整,涉疆报道的数量与态度也会改变。
In the exchanges between China and Türkiye,Xinjiang-related issues are inevitable but can easily lead to differences.During the period from 2019 to 2022,in the two major English media in Türkiye(Hurriyet Daily News and Daily Sabah),they covered reports of Xinjiang differently in terms of quantity,topics and dis-course.Based on the two corpora the authors built,the topic words and the extended meaning units of the three core words"China/Chinese,Xinjiang and Uighur(s)"were analyzed.It is found that the issues concerned by the two media mainly focus on human rights situations in Xinjiang and convey obvious negative semantic prosody.The main methods used to express their prejudice against Chinese government are:strengthening its religious and eth-nic attribute of Xinjiang people;stigmatizing"vocational education"in Xinjiang;politicizing issues such as medi-cine,education,culture and so on;using negative language.This is consistent with the Pan-Turkism in Türkiye and its political interests in the Middle East and Central Asia.However,we believe that with the deepening of bilat-eral relations,the ideological and political positions of the media will also be adjusted,and the quantity and atti-tude of Xinjiang-related reports will also be changed.
作者
曾晓红
刘静静
孔令蓉
ZENG Xiaohong;LIU Jingjing;KONG Lingrong(Research Center of China's Neighboring Countries,Mianyang Teachers'College,Mianyang,Sichuan 621000)
出处
《绵阳师范学院学报》
2024年第3期62-77,99,共17页
Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College
基金
绵阳师范学院中国周边国家研究中心项目“基于语料库的土耳其主流媒体涉疆报道的话语分析--以《自由报》(2019-2022)为例”(23ZBGJ-B011)。
关键词
涉疆报道
语料库
话语分析
《自由报》
《晨报》
Xinjiang-related reports,corpus,discourse analysis,Hurriyet Daily News
Daily Sabah
