期刊文献+

人格判断的非语言线索:基于微信交流的透镜模型分析

Nonverbal Cues for Personality Judgment:A Lens Model Analysis Based on WeChat Communication
原文传递
导出
摘要 该研究考查了微信即时交流中人格判断的非语言线索,并运用透镜模型分析检验了这些线索在不同互动时长条件下对人格判断准确性的影响。结果表明:(1)除神经质外,大五人格其余四种特质总体的自我—他人一致性(SOA)均达到显著水平,平均SOA随互动时长增加而递增;(2)微信交流的非语言线索非常广泛,很多非语言线索在观察者的人格判断中是有效的和可用的;(3)在10min和20min组中,“字数”和“消息量”是外倾性的诊断性线索,“表情符号”和“文字重复”是宜人性与开放性的诊断性线索;(4)观察者对10min组的宜人性和外倾性线索以及20min组所有特质的线索敏感性均显著,且随互动时长增加而同步提高。 Computer-mediated communication(CMC)refers to the cluster of interpersonal communication technologies that are based upon the transfer and storage of information among interconnected networks of computers.Common CMCs include email,instant messaging,social networking sites,etc.WeChat is one of the most common CMC forms in China.It is generally believed that CMC lacks abundant nonverbal cues,which makes it difficult to conduct effective emotional communication and to form accurate personality impression.However,numerous studies have found that there is no lack of non-verbal communication in CMC,and users have created many emotional cues to adapt to this new communication situation,such as“emoticons”,“word repetition”and so on.Emoticons and other nonverbal cues can be used to enhance the perceived richness of CMC,and increase the accuracy of message interpretation.CMC nonverbal helps avoid the effects of ambiguity in online communication,by supporting interactors decipher intent from ambiguous messages.The purpose of this study is to explore the use of CMC nonverbal cues and whether they can affect the accuracy of personality judgment in WeChat communication situations by using the WeChat software platform.Procedure:In the experiment,146 participants were divided into three groups(50,46,50)and conducted pair-to-pair WeChat instant chat for 5min,10min,and 20min respectively.All 146 participants evaluated each other's personality after the chat and were asked to submit screenshots of the chat transcripts via e-mail.Finally,we conducted classified statistics and lens model analysis on the non-verbal cues in chat materials,including“word count”,“message amount”,“emoticons”,“punctuation”,and“word repetition”.The results showed that:(1)Except for neuroticism,the total self-other agreement(SOA)of the other four traits reached a significant level,and the average SOA increased with the length of interaction;(2)The frequency of non-verbal cues in WeChat communication was 55.8%;(3)In the 10min and 20min groups,“word count”and“message amount”were diagnostic cues of extroversion,while“emoticons”and“word repetition”were diagnostic cues of agreeableness and openness;(4)The sensitivity of observers to cues of agreeableness and extroversion in the 10min group and to cues of all traits in the 20min group were significant,and improved with the increase of interaction duration.These results suggest that WeChat communication-based personality judgments have certain accuracy,and the non-verbal cues are closely related to the accuracy of personality judgments,especially extroversion,openness,and agreeableness.Non-verbal cues are common in WeChat communication.Individuals will use a lot of non-verbal information during WeChat interaction,and observers will infer the level of personality traits of the target based on this information.However,only by providing a long enough communication time(20min)can the target present effective nonverbal cues,which can be used by the observer to infer relevant traits and make accurate judgments.
作者 林志鹏 陈少华 卢桢 Lin Zhipeng;Chen Shaohua;Lu Zhen(School of Education,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou,510006)
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2024年第2期350-357,共8页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 广州市哲学社会科学“十四五”规划项目(2021GZGJ186)的资助。
关键词 微信交流 人格判断 非语言线索 透镜模型分析 自我—他人一致性 WeChat communication personality judgment nonverbal cues lens model analysis self-other agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the inte- grative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158.
  • 3Burisch M. You don't always get what you pay for: Measur- ing depression with short and simple versus long and so- phisticated scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 1984, 18:81-98.
  • 4John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL. The big five inventory- versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.
  • 5Rammstedt B, John OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 2007, 41: 203-212.
  • 6Benet-Martinez V, John OP. Los Cinco Grandes across cul- tures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-muhimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75:729-750.
  • 7Robins RW, Tracy JL, Trzesniewski KH, Potter J, et al.Per- sonality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 2001,35:463-482.
  • 8Tsaousis I, Kerpelis P. The traits personality questionnaire 5 (TPQue5): Psychometric properties of a shortened version of a big five measure. European. Journal of Psychological As- sessment, 2004, 20:180-191.
  • 9Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 10Balsis, S. , Cooper, L. D. , & Oltmanns, T. F. ( 2014 ). Are in- formant reports of personality more internally consistent than self - reports of personality? Assessment,21 ( 1 ), 1 - 6.

共引文献333

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部