摘要
质性数据分析的科学性一直是学界争论的话题。随着质性数据分析软件的应用,质性研究的效率、技术衍生的“客观性”均进入大众视野,也出现了若干对质性分析软件的误解。本研究以NVivo软件在教育领域的应用为例,澄清软件的“可为”与“难为”,并借此从分析过程层面呈现教育质性分析的科学性。作为组织研究想法、记录并追问研究发现、追踪与反思乃至共享结论诞生过程的工具,软件有益于质性研究实现从熟悉文本、结构化到整合数据的过渡,提升质性分析效率,并提供了让复杂的诠释性实践拥有可见、可讨论的可能。然而,软件操作只有与方法论、分析策略相结合,为研究者所善用,才能在提升效率的同时保障质性研究的科学性。
The scientific nature of qualitative data analysis has always been debated in the academic community.With the popularity of qualitative data analysis software,the efficiency and objectivity of qualitative research have been brought to the public's attention.Meanwhile,several misconceptions have emerged regarding the capabilities of the software.This study articulates the analysis procedure facilitated by NVivo software of a study in the educational field to explain what software can and cannot accomplish,thus further clarifying the scientific nature of qualitative analysis regarding analysis procedures.As a tool that enables researchers to organize ideas,record findings,question findings,and track,reflect on and share the process of drawing conclusions,NVivo facilitates the transition from familiarity with the text to structuring and integrating the data set with an efficient approach.It also promotes the visibility of complex interpretive practices.However,unless software techniques are coupled appropriately with qualitative methodologies and strategies,qualitative research analyses cannot be made more efficient and scientifically reliable.
作者
孟宇
沈伟
MENG Yu;SHEN Wei(School of Education,Central China Normal University,Wuhan Hubei 430079,China;Institute of International and Comparative Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处
《苏州大学学报（教育科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第1期24-34,共11页
Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition)
基金
全国教育科学规划课题“乡村教师教育供给主体多元化及协同机制研究”(项目编号:BFA200069)的阶段性研究成果。
