摘要
能源法的核心范畴界定较为模糊,亟待澄清。基于能源权利与能源权力的交互性、能源公益与能源私益的均衡性、能源监管与能源市场的协调性等需求考量,法权可作为能源法的核心范畴。能源法法权结构可从本体论、运行论和价值论三个层面予以构造,形成体系化安排。本体论上,应以公民能源权利与国家能源权力的交互为基础,强调公民能源权作为法权结构的逻辑起点、以落脚为能源普遍服务的能源权力作为法权结构的基本保障;运行论上,应以能源合同作为法权结构运行的具体承载;价值论上,应以能源正义作为法权结构价值的最终目的。由此,可仰仗能源法的法权结构构筑能源法学体系。
The core mainstay of energy law is vaguely defined which needs to be clarified.Based on the consideration of the interaction between energy rights and energy power,the balance between energy public interests and energy private interests,and the coordination between energy regulation and energy market,Faquan-the combination of right and power of energy laws serves as the core mainstay of energy law.The structure of Faquan can be deconstructed from three levels:ontology,operation theory and value theory.Thus,a systematic arrangement can be formed.Onto-logically,it should be based on the interaction of citizens' energy rights and national energy power.The interaction emphases the citizens' energy rights as thestarting point of Faquan,and the national power within the energy universal service duty as the basic guarantee.The part of operationshould carry the energy contracts as the specific bearing.For the value part,it should use the energy justice as the ultimate purpose.As a result,the energy jurisprudence system can be constructed based on Faquan-the combination of right and power of energy laws.
作者
张忠民
Zhang Zhongmin(Law School,Ecological Civilization Institute of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期99-111,共13页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费项目“生态文明交叉学科科研创新团队建设”(2722023AL003)
“‘双碳’目标下碳补偿机制的法治创新研究”(2722023BQ029)
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“新时代生态文明机制创新与重点流域、区域、海域生态环境治理研究”(22JJD820013)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
法权
能源法法权
公民能源权
能源普遍服务
能源合同
能源正义
faquan
the combination of right and power of energy laws
citizen's energy right
energy universal service duty
energy contracts
energy justice
