摘要
2022年新修改的《反垄断法》首次引入民事检察公益诉讼制度。在《反垄断法》仅原则性规定该制度的情形下,民事检察公益诉讼制度在反垄断领域的适用面临诸多问题,有必要对其制度功能及具体实施规则进行解释论展开,从而反哺反垄断民事检察公益诉讼司法实践。站在解释论的视角看,反垄断民事检察公益诉讼制度既是为了解决垄断行为造成的公共利益损害问题,亦是为了回应传统反垄断法实施困境的有效措施。反垄断民事检察公益诉讼的受案范围应当坚持“公共利益”标准,并对垄断行为造成的竞争损害和社会公共利益损害之间的关系进行解释与澄清。在反垄断民事检察公益诉讼中,检察机关可以探索适用行为保全措施、恢复原状、惩罚性赔偿、检察建议等多种形式的法律措施,从而与传统反垄断公共执行及私人执行之间形成体系协调,共同实现反垄断法的立法目标。
The newly amended Anti-Monopoly Law in 2022 introduced the system of civil procuratorial public interest litigation for the first time.In view of the fact that the Anti-Monopoly Law only provides a general provision for this system,there are some problems in its application.It is thus necessary to interpret the system function and specific implementation rules of the civil procuratorial public interest litigation so as to feed back for the judicial practice.From the perspective of legal interpretation,anti-monopoly civil procuratorial public interest litigation is not only to compensate for the public interest damage caused by monopolistic conduct,but also an effective measure to solve the difficulties faced by the traditional implementation of Anti-Monopoly Law.When determining the scope of case acccecptance in anti-monopoly civil procuratorial public interest litigation,it is essential to adhere to the standard of public interest,and to clarify the relationship between antitrust harm caused by monopolistic conduct and social public interest damage.In the anti-monopoly civil procuratorial public interest litigation,the procuratorate can explore the application of litigation injunctions,restitution,punitive damages,procuratorial advice and other forms of litigation measures,so as to form a system coordination with the traditional anti-monopoly public and private measures,and jointly achieve legislative goals of the Anti-Monopoly Law.
作者
吴佩乘
WU Peicheng(Law School,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310008,China)
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期74-87,共14页
Modern Law Science
基金
国家社科基金青年项目“我国互联网平台封禁行为的反垄断规制研究”(23CFX028)。
关键词
反垄断法
民事检察公益诉讼
解释论
平台垄断
公共利益
anti-monopoly law
civil procuratorial public interest litigation
legal interpretation
platform monopoly
public interest
