摘要
一般认为,作为他人行动之合法与违法的最终判断者,法律人必须持有某种独特的法律人思维。然而,由于法律人思维必然以法律推理为核心,且推理必然是普遍性的,所以法律人思维不可能是特殊的,但这并不意味着法律人同样缺乏特殊性。法律人必须将自己的判断建立在法律的基础上,并且其中的法律仅指实在法,因此法律人必须得表达法律(实在法)关于该事物的看法,而不是他们自己关于该事物的看法,这就是所谓的法律观点。既然法律人所表达的是法律对某事物的看法,这就要求法律必须人格化,而法律人格化的依据,一方面在于法律有能力主张自己是正当的,另一方面在于必须同意名词化的法治。
It is generally believed that as the ultimate decision-makers of others'actions,lawyers must hold a special attitude to law,which is called legal thinking.However,since legal reasoning,as the core of legal thinking,is necessarily universality,legal thinking cannot be particular.It cannot be denied that lawyers have to make their judgments according to the law which only refers to positive law,they must express the law's view on the matter,rather than their own views,which is the so-called legal point of view.Since there is a legal point of view,the law must be personified,which is based on two conditions.The first is the law's ability to claim itself legitimacy,and the second is the nominalization of the rule of law.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第2期184-203,共20页
China Legal Science
