摘要
《明实录》关于陈献章的记载存在抵牾。宪宗实录编修时,史官们以程朱理学为正统,陈氏及白沙心学被视为“另类”,因此陈氏传记多为负面记载。孝宗等朝实录编修时,白沙心学渐从“另类”转变为正统,信奉心学的史官们越来越多地主导着历史话语权,相关记载遂以正面为主。这是陈氏及白沙心学沉浮境遇在明代当朝国史中的反映。宪宗实录中陈氏传记未必真实可信,却展现出历史的另一面相,其书写价值值得重视。这例个案的考察,反映出实录编修在追求“价值正确”过程中面对“另类”与正统转变的困窘。
There are contradictions in the records of Chen Xian-zhang in the Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty.When compiling the records,the official historians regarded the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism as Orthodoxy and dismissed Chen Xian-zhang and his study of the mind as alternative,thus his biography was mostly negative.When records of the reigns of Xiao-zong and other Ming emperors were being compiled,Baisha’s learning was gradually restored to an orthodox position,as the official historians who believed in Baisha’s study of the mind dominated the historical discourse of the time and the relevant records were mainly positive in the Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty.This is a reflection of the ups and downs of ChenXian-zhang and his learning in the official records.Although the biography of Cheng Xianzhang in the official records of the Xianzong emperor is mostly negative and not credible,it shows another aspect of history and its narrative value is noteworthy.The investigation of this case also reflects the predicament in the transformation from“alterna-tive”to orthodoxy in the process of pursuing the“correct value”of that time.
出处
《五邑大学学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第2期21-25,92,共6页
Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划岭南文化项目“明代国史视阈中的广东人:《明实录》粤籍人物传记研究”(批准号:GD20LN03)之阶段性研究成果。
关键词
《明实录》
陈献章
“另类”
正统
历史书写
Veritable Records of the Ming Dynasty
Chen Xian-zhang
Alternative
Orthodoxy
Historical writing
