摘要
目的 评估丁苯酞序贯疗法(BST)辅助治疗对急性一氧化碳中毒迟发性脑病(DEACMP)的临床疗效。方法 选取延安市人民医院神经内科2018年1月至2023年6月就诊的DEACMP患者为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将DEACMP患者随机分为高压氧治疗(HBOT)组、糖皮质激素(GC)组(GC联合HBOT)、BST组(HBOT、GC联合BST),均持续治疗30 d。观察并比较3组DEACMP治疗期间不良反应发生情况及治疗后临床疗效。比较3组治疗前后炎症指标、神经损伤指标、认知功能、神经功能和日常生活能力。结果 研究共纳入患者120例,每组各40例。治疗期间,3组患者均未观察到严重不良反应事件,无1例患者因不良反应而终止治疗。BST组治疗总有效率显著高于GC组和HBOT组,而GC组高于HBOT组(P<0.05)。治疗前,3组炎症指标、神经损伤指标、认知功能、神经功能和日常生活功能评分差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。治疗后,3组血清脂蛋白磷脂酶(LP-PLA2)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、中枢神经特异蛋白(S100-β)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),且BST组低于HBOT组和GC组,GC组低于HBOT组(P<0.05)。治疗后,3组简易智力状态检查量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、和Barthel指数(BI)评分均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),但美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分下降(P<0.05)。此外,BST组MMSE、MoCA、和BI评分高于HBOT组和GC组(P<0.05),NIHSS评分低于HBOT组和GC组(P<0.05);GC组MMSE、MoCA、BI评分高于HBOT组,NIHSS评分低于HBOT组(P<0.05)。结论 与HBOT治疗和HBOT联合GC治疗比较,BST辅助治疗可提升DECAMP患者临床疗效,改善炎症状态、认知功能和日常生活能力。
Objective To assess the clinical efficacy of butylphthalide sequential therapy(BST) as an adjuvant therapy for delayed onset encephalopathy caused by acute carbon monoxide poisoning(DEACMP).Methods DEACMP patients who visited the department of neurology at Yan'an People's Hospital from January 2018 to June 2023 were selected as the research subjects.Using a random number table method,DEACMP patients were randomly divided into hyperbaric oxygen therapy(HBOT) group,glucocorticoid(GC) group(GC combined with,HBOT),and BST group(HBOT,GC combined with BST),all of which were treated continuously for 30 days.The incidence of adverse reactions and clinical efficacy during the treatment among three groups of DEACMP were observed and compared.Inflammation indicators,neurological damage indicators,cognitive function,neurological function,and daily living ability before and a?ter treatment among three groups were compared.Results A total of 120 patients were included in the study,with 40 patients in each group.During the treatment period,no serious adverse reactions were observed in any of the three groups of patients,and no patient terminated treatment due to adverse reactions.The total effective rate of BST group was significantly higher than those of GC group and HBOT group,while the total effective rate of GC group was higher than that of HBOT group(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05) in the scores of inflammation indicators,neurological damage indicators,cognitive function,neurological function,and daily living function among the three groups.After treatment,the serum LP-PLA2,SIRI,TNF-α,S100-β,and the NSE levels decreased compared to before treatment(P<0.05),and the indicators of the BST group was lower than those of the HBOT group and GC group,while the indicators of the GC group was lower than those of the HBOT group(P<0.05).A?ter treatment,the MMSE,MoCA,and BI scores of the three groups increased compared to before treatment(P<0.05),but the NIHSS score decreased(P<0.05).In addition,the MMSE,MoCA,and BI scores of the BST group were higher than those of the HBOT and GC groups(P<0.05),while the NIHSS scores were lower than those of the HBOT and GC groups(P<0.05).The MMSE,MoCA,and BI scores in the GC group were higher than those in the HBOT group,while the NIHSS scores were lower than those in the HBOT group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with HBOT treatment and HBOT combined with GC treatment,BST adjuvant therapy can improve the clinical efficacy,inflammatory status,cognitive function,and daily living ability of DECAMP patients.
作者
郝美美
田甜
白如玉
班玉霞
康静
HAO Meimei;TIAN Tian;BAI Ruyu;BAN Yuxia;KANG Jing(Department of Neurology,Yan'an People's Hospital,Yanan 716000,Shaanxi Province,China;Department of Brain Disease,Yan'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Yanan 716000,Shaanxi Province,China)
出处
《中国药师》
CAS
2024年第5期817-825,共9页
China Pharmacist
基金
延安市科技计划项目(2021YF-16)。
关键词
一氧化碳中毒迟发性脑病
丁苯酞序贯疗法
临床疗效
高压氧治疗
糖皮质激素
Delayed encephalopathy of acute carbon monoxide poisoning
Butylphthalide sequential therapy
Clinical efficacy
Hyperbaric oxygenation
Glucocorticoids
Clinical efficacy
