期刊文献+

对比5.0T与3.0T平扫MRI显示胰岛素瘤质量

Comparison on image quality of insulinoma 5.0T and 3.0T non-contrast MRI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比5.0T与3.0T平扫MRI显示胰岛素瘤质量。方法前瞻性对12例胰岛素瘤患者以5.0T和3.0T MR仪采集术前腹部T1WI、T2WI平扫并行弥散加权成像(DWI),对比5.0T与3.0T各序列MR图像质量主观评分及肿瘤-胰腺实质对比度评分,观察肿瘤信噪比(SNR)和对比度噪声比(CNR),比较各序列图像及总体肿瘤显示率。结果5.0T T1WI和DWI显示胰岛素瘤的主观评分均高于3.0T T1WI和DWI(P均<0.05),5.0T T2WI主观评分与3.0T T2WI差异无统计学意义(P=0.166)。针对肿瘤-胰腺实质对比度评分,5.0T T1WI高于3.0T T1WI(P=0.023),而5.0T T2WI与3.0T T2WI、5.0T DWI与3.0T DWI差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。胰岛素瘤SNR在5.0T T2WI高于3.0T T2WI(P=0.015),5.0T T1WI与3.0T T1WI、5.0T DWI与3.0T DWI之间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05);胰岛素瘤CNR在5.0T与3.0T各序列图像差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。5.0T T1WI、T2WI及DWI胰岛素瘤显示率分别为100%(12/12)、66.67%(8/12)及83.33%(10/12),3.0T T1WI、T2WI及DWI分别为75.00%(9/12)、58.33%(7/12)及66.67%(8/12);5.0T MRI胰岛素瘤总体显示率为100%(12/12),3.0T MRI为83.33%(10/12)。结论相比3.0T MRI,胰岛素瘤5.0T MRI显示胰岛素瘤更佳并有利于诊断。 Objective To compare image quality of 5.0T and 3.0T non-contrast MRI for displaying insulinoma.Methods Twelve patients with insulinoma were prospectively enrolled,and non-contrast abdominal T1WI,T2WI as well as diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)were acquired using 5.0T and 3.0T MR scanners,respectively.The subjective scores of image quality of each sequence of 5.0T and 3.0T MRI,also of tumor-pancreas parenchyma contrast scores were compared.The signal-to-noise ratio(SNR)and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR)of insulinomas were observed,and the displayed rate of insulinoma by each sequence and overall MRI were compared.Results The subjective scores of 5.0T T1WI and DWI were higher than those of 3.0T T1WI and DWI(both P<0.05),but not significantly different between 5.0T and 3.0T T2WI(P=0.166).Furthermore,the tumor-pancreas parenchyma contrast score of 5.0T T1WI was higher than that of 3.0T T1WI(P=0.023),but not significantly different between 5.0T and 3.0T T2WI,nor between 5.0T and 3.0T DWI(both P>0.05).SNR of insulinomas on 5.0T T2WI were higher than on 3.0T T2WI(P=0.015),however,no significant difference of SNR was found between 5.0T and 3.0T T1WI,nor between 5.0T and 3.0T DWI(both P>0.05).CNR of insulinomas on all 5.0T MRI were not significantly different with those on 3.0T MRI(all P>0.05).The displayed rate of insulinoma on 5.0T T1WI,T2WI and DWI was 100%(12/12),66.67%(8/12)and 83.33%(10/12),respectively,on 3.0T T1WI,T2WI and DWI was 75.00%(9/12),58.33%(7/12),66.67%(8/12),respectively.The overall displayed rate of insulinoma on 5.0T and 3.0T MRI was 100%(12/12)and 83.33%(10/12),respectively.Conclusion Compared with 3.0T MRI,5.0T MRI was superior for displaying insulinoma,hence being helpful for diagnosis.
作者 赵慧佳 朱亮 高瑞辰 尹博辉 孙淦 薛珂 杨于昕 徐强 吴文铭 冯逢 ZHAO Huijia;ZHU Liang;GAO Ruichen;YIN Bohui;SUN Gan;XUE Ke;YANG Yuxin;XU Qiang;WU Wenming;FENG Feng(Department of General Surgery,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;Department of Radiology,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases,Beijing 100730,China;Theranostics and Translational Research Center,National Infrastructures for Translational Medicine,Institute of Clinical Medicine,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;United Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging,Beijing 100094,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第5期686-689,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 北京协和医院中央高水平医院临床科研专项(2022-PUMCH-D-001)、国家自然科学基金(82371950)。
关键词 胰岛素瘤 磁共振成像 图像质量 诊断 前瞻性研究 insulinoma magnetic resonance imaging image quality diagnosis prospective studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1Dennis Vaidakis,John Karoubalis,Theodora Pappa,George Piaditis,George N Zografos.Pancreatic insulinoma:current issues and trends[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2010,9(3):234-241. 被引量:23
  • 2C.Caramella,C Dromain,T.De Baere,B.Boulet,M.Schlumberger,M.Ducreux,程悦.胰腺内分泌肿瘤:MRI哪些序列最有价值?[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2011(1). 被引量:2
  • 3王冬青,曾蒙苏,饶圣祥,杨姗,汤敏.胰腺内分泌肿瘤的MRI诊断[J].临床放射学杂志,2006,25(1):45-48. 被引量:24
  • 4曾缨,王凌云,郑民缨,张成,张为西.55例胰岛素瘤所致神经精神症状的临床研究[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2006,32(2):176-178. 被引量:15
  • 5潘宏铭,朱艳虹.神经内分泌肿瘤诊断及治疗[J].中国医刊,2006,41(5):10-13. 被引量:7
  • 6Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after "carcinoid": pidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35, 825 eases in the United States. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26(18):3063-3072.
  • 7Oberg K, AkerstrOm, G, Rindi G, et al. Neuroendrine gastroentero pancreatic tumours: ESMO Clinical Pratice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol, 2010,21(5) :223-227.
  • 8Niederle MB, Haekl M, Kaserer K, et al. Gastroenteropancre- atic neuroendocrine tumours: The current incidence and staging based on the WHO and European Neuroendocrine Tumour Socie- ty classification : An analysis based on prospectively collected pa- rameters. Endoer Relat Cancer, 2010,17(4):909-918.
  • 9Semelka RC, Custodio CM, Cem Balci N, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: Spectrum of appearances on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000,11(2) :141-148.
  • 10Rosch T, Lightdale CJ, Botet JF, et al. Localization of pancre- atic endocrine tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography. N Engl J Med, 1992,326(26) :1721-1726.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部