摘要
在理论界中,对“隔空猥亵”行为的刑法定性素来存在争议。最高人民法院、最高人民检察院专门颁布了《关于办理强奸、猥亵未成年人刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》,将“隔空猥亵”行为以猥亵类犯罪进行定性。然而,其规定本身存在一定的疑问,并且在适用的过程中与刑事法律规范存在不协调之处,因而需要进一步对其予以解释和修改。应当明确的是,在犯罪对象方面,“隔空猥亵”的犯罪对象之所以限于未成年人是源于对法益脆弱对象的特别保护需求;在客观行为结构方面,“隔空猥亵”行为呈现复合性,以“胁迫、诱骗”为必要前置行为,这意味着“隔空猥亵”儿童的,儿童自愿可以排除猥亵儿童罪的入罪;在犯罪主体方面,应当对入罪主体作适当限缩,对于未成年人之间实施“隔空猥亵”的严以认定,宽大处理;在主观方面,不再以“追求性刺激”为主观倾向。
In the theoretical field,there has always been controversy over the criminal law characterization of"Non-contact Indecency"Behavior.Recently,the Supreme People's Court and Procuratorate issued the""Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Rape and Sexual Assault of Minors",which classified"Non-contact Indecency"as a sexual assault crime.However,there are certain doubts about its provisions themselves,and there are inconsistencies with criminal legal norms in the application process,so further interpretation and modification are needed.It should be clear that in terms of the criminal target,the reason why the criminal target of"Non-contact Indecency"is limited to minors is due to the special protection needs for vulnerable legal interests;In terms of objective behavioral structure,the behavior of"Non-contact Indecency"presents complexity,with"coercion and deception"as necessary pre behaviors.This means that in the case of"sexual harassment in the distance"of children,children can voluntarily exclude the inclusion of the crime of child molestation;As for the criminal subject,appropriate restrictions should be imposed on the incriminating subject,and strict identification and lenient treatment should be given to minors who engage in"space based molestation";In terms of subjectivity,there is no longer a subjective tendency towards pursuing sexual stimulation.
作者
吴允锋
童一峰
Wu Yunfeng;Tong Yifeng(East China University of Political Science and Law,S Shanghai200000)
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2024年第1期56-62,共7页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词
隔空猥亵
未成年人
强制猥亵罪
猥亵儿童罪
倾向犯
enterprise compliance
incentive system
prevent risks
compliance rectification
third-party supervision mechanism
