摘要
本文分析天下问题的先验逻辑。天下理论试图处理复数主体的共在可能性以及主体间分歧的跨主体和解,是一种现实问题约束下的最优可能解法。自由的复数主体之间的冲突问题是人类生活中不断递归出现的根本问题。复数主体的存在论事实要求政治必须超越个人、国家、帝国或文明的一元论政治单位,进入内含所有层次的利益单位和政治问题的天下。共在存在论将多元共在置于个体存在之先,是多元政治唯一合理解法。由此产生的跨主体性,从主体间可能关系而非个人之中推论出主体间的自由原则。未来天下将从政治天下、道德天下、知识天下三个维度展开,其中包含世界内部化、关系理性和孔子改善等宪法性政治概念,万向对称的道德原则,以及跨主体性的新百科全书。
This article makes analysis on the transcendental logic of Tianxia(all land under heaven).The Tianxia theory tries to address the possibility of coexistence and trans-subjective reconciliation among multiple subjects,presenting itself as the optimal feasible solution under the constraints of real-world problems.The fundamental challenge which is recursive in human life is the conflict among free multiple subjects,whose ontological reality necessitates that politics transcend monolithic political units such as individuals,nation-states,empires,or civilizations,evolving instead into a Tianxia encompassing all levels of interest-bearing entities and political concerns.The coexistence ontology places the multiplicity of coexistence prior to individual existence,offering the only rational solution to pluralistic politics.The resultant trans-subjectivity infers the principles of freedom among subjects not from within individuals,but from the possible relationships among them.The future Tianxia will unfold itself through three dimensions:the political Tianxia,the moral Tianxia,and the epistemic Tianxia.These dimensions incorporate constitutional political concepts such as the internalization of the world,relational rationality,and Confucian improvement,alongside principles of moral symmetry applicable across myriad directions,and a new encyclopedia of trans-subjectivity.
作者
赵汀阳
ZHAO Ting-yang(Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Institute of Philosophy,Beijing 100732)
出处
《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第3期5-17,共13页
Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
天下
关系理性
元图书馆
Tianxia
relational rationality
meta-library
