摘要
从一体模式到区分原则,物权变动模式的巨变贯穿着独具中国特色的民法思维,也扎牢了无权处分制度的根基。由于我国区分原则未采纳物权独立性与无因性原理,故而分析无权处分必须以债权形式主义为出发点。《合同编通则解释》第19条续造了《民法典》第597条无权处分效力的规定,凸显了区分的态度,拓展了适用范围,明晰了生效要件,对真正权利人有着倾向性保护,是以“抽象补充”的方式补充漏洞。但白璧微瑕,《合同编通则解释》第19条有一刀切归责之嫌,也有私法价值凸显不足的缺漏,值得进一步考究完善。
From the integrated model to the principle of distinction,the great changes in the mode of change of property rights run through the thinking of civil law with unique Chinese character⁃istics,and also lay a solid foundation for the system of unauthorized disposition.Since China’s princi⁃ple of distinction does not adopt the principle of independence and causality of property rights,the analysis of unauthorized disposition must be based on the formalism of creditor’s rights.Article 19 of the Interpretation of the General Principles of Contract Compilation continues the provision on the ef⁃fect of unauthorized disposition in Article 597 of the Civil Code,highlighting the attitude of distinc⁃tion,expanding the scope of application,clarifying the requirements for effectiveness,and providing biased protection for the true rights holder,which is supplemented by“abstract supplementation”.However,Article 19 of the Interpretation of the General Principles of Contract Compilation is suspect⁃ed of being a one-size-fits-all imputation of responsibility,and there are also deficiencies in the val⁃ue of private law,which deserve further investigation and improvement.
作者
刘宇林
LIU Yu-in(School of Law,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan,610068)
出处
《韩山师范学院学报》
2024年第4期65-71,共7页
Journal of Hanshan Normal University
关键词
《合同编通则解释》第19条
无权处分
物权变动模式
债权形式主义
区分原则
Article 19 of the Interpretation of the General Principles of Contract Compilation
unauthorized disposition
mode of change of property rights
creditor’s rights formalism
principle of distinction
