摘要
在现代纠纷解决机制中,亲历性是一项共同的规则。如果说,行政复议法(2023)新增的第四章确立了“复议审理”在整个行政复议程序结构中的中心地位,那么,“以审理为中心”的行政复议过程就理所当然地要贯彻亲历性规则。在行政复议的普通程序中,亲历性内在地包含直接审理、言词审理、听证实质化等基本内容。其中,直接审理应遵循在场规则、直接采证规则和转换禁止规则;言词审理应遵循言词沟通规则、言词认证规则和言词求证规则;听证实质化则要求,在行政复议普通程序中,为确保复议听证的实质性作用,必须遵循程序的共享性规则、作用的此在性规则和笔录的排他性规则。
In contemporary dispute resolution mechanisms,the integration of personal experience is a widely acknowledged principle.If we say that Chapter IV of the Administrative Reconsideration Law(2023 Revised)establishes the central position of“review-trial”in the entire structure of the administrative review process,then the administrative review process,which is“trial-centered”,should naturally adhere to the rule of personal experience.In the general procedure of administrative review,personal experience inherently includes basic elements such as direct trial,verbal trial,and substantive hearing.Among them,the principle of direct trial should follow the rules of presence,the rules of direct evidence and the rules of conversion prohibition;the principle of verbal trial should follow the rules of verbal communication,the rules of verbal authentication and the rules of verbal verification;the principle of substantive hearing,to ensure the substantive role of review hearing,should follow the rules of equal procedure,the rules of acting“Dasein”and the rules of administrative files exclusivity.
出处
《法治现代化研究》
CSSCI
2024年第1期13-30,共18页
Law and Modernization
关键词
行政复议
亲历性
直接审理
言词审理
听证实质化
administrative review
personal experience
direct trial
verbal trial
substantive hearing
