摘要
在以数字智能技术为驱动的社会转型背景下,公共性生产不再局限于政府等传统公共机构的参与,而是在主体与领域的扩展中形成了数字异化的态势,超级数字平台便是其中之一。以此为背景,基于开放共享的网络效应,超级数字平台的公共性逐渐形成;基于服务依赖的权利让渡,超级数字平台逐渐获得话语权;基于技术优势的双重控制,超级数字平台的私权力得以生成与演进。对超级数字平台私权力进行解构发现,其可能产生算法技术的滥用、合同机制的失效、用户权利的忽视等对私主体的风险,从而引起私法保护核心的坍塌;也将导致政府监管难度增加、垄断地位形成、公共利益受损,进而对公权力产生影响,导致公法规制逻辑的紊乱。因此,应当尝试以公私主体关系为路径对超级数字平台私权力进行规制:一方面,通过格式合同的协同规制、侵权规则的更新解释、私力救济的条款重视等贯彻以私法为核心的意思自治。另一方面,通过明确私权力的责任与义务、监管数字内容与技术应用、保障协议规则的客观公平等再造公益保障的公法逻辑。
In the social context driven by digital intelligence technologies,public production is no longer limited to conventional public entities such as government agencies.The scope of subjects and content is expanding.In the iterative upgrade of digital information technologies,super digital platforms,as private power entities,can participate extensively in public production activities due to their user base,technological power,and resource advantages.However,the embedding of private power in super digital platforms impacts the conventional binary structure of public and private power,giving rise to a“public power-private power-private rights”ternary structure.Existing research mainly focuses on constraining private power with public law and private law,and balancing public and private power from the perspective of platform publicity.However,few studies have paid close attention to the balance of public and private power in public law,private law,and platform publicity from an overall perspective.Based on the literature review,this paper takes the“formation of platform publicity-acquisition of platform discourse power-evolution of platform private power”as a progressive approach to elaborate the profound impact of super digital platforms on public production in aspects such as information aggregation,content distribution,and transaction promotion.However,although super digital platforms exist as private power entities,they have certain public characteristics due to their technological control and discourse power advantages,forming a duality in the sense of public and private law.This has led to technological institutional risks.It may deviate from the core of private law protection by abusing algorithms,disrupting contract mechanisms,and ignoring user rights.It may also disrupt the logic of public regulation by impeding government supervision,forming monopolistic positions,and undermining social interests.Therefore,it is necessary to explore the correction plan for private power in super digital platforms based on the relationship between public and private entities and with public production as the starting point.On the one hand,it can implement the core of private law autonomy through paths such as collaborative regulation of standard contracts,updated interpretation of tort rules,and emphasis on private relief clauses.On the other hand,it should reconstruct the public law logic of public welfare protection by clarifying the responsibilities and obligations of private power,supervising digital content and technology applications,and ensuring the objectivity and fairness of agreement rules,thus achieving systematic regulation of platform power from the perspective of the ternary structure.This paper provides policy suggestions for achieving a joint effort between high-power regulation of regulatory authorities,the public,and third-party institutions,and provides theoretical references for subsequent research.
作者
李凌寒
冯彦龙
LI Ling-han;FENG Yan-long(School of Economics,Anhui University,Hefei 230601,China;Centre for Constitutional and Basic Law Studies,University of Macao,Macao 999078,China)
出处
《财经问题研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第7期74-87,共14页
Research On Financial and Economic Issues
关键词
超级数字平台
私权力
公共性生产
公私二象性
数字治理
super digital platforms
private power
public production
public-private dualism
digital governance
