摘要
《民法典》第768条明确了保理债权多重转让时的对抗顺位,其适用前提为在公示对抗主义规则中,同一项应收账款债权并存多个保理人之对抗竞争。有追索权保理债权让与亦应当适用该规定,而非类推适用《民法典》第414、415条典型担保物权规定。对抗要件并存时的登记优先规则创造性地结合了登记在先与通知在先模式,然而因保理登记的操作困难,不得不削弱登记效力和扩张通知的适用范围。对抗要件不明时的债权分割规则以债权平等为基础,其实质为各保理人不当得利返还的比例分配。
Article 768 of the Civil Code clarifies the antagonistic order of multiple transfer of factoring claims,and its application premise is that in the public antagonism rule,the same accounts receivable claims coexist with the antagonistic competition of multiple factoring.This provision should also be applied to the assignment of factoring claims with recourse,rather than the typical security interest provisions in Articles 414 and 415 of the Civil Code.However,due to the difficulty of factoring registration,the validity of registration has to be weakened and the scope of application of notice has to be expanded.The rules of the division of claims when the counteraction is unclear are based on the equality of claims,and its essence is the proportional distribution of unjust enrichment return by each factor.
出处
《上海市经济管理干部学院学报》
2024年第4期40-47,共8页
Journal of Shanghai Economic Management College
基金
2023年中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项中研究生科研创新平台项目“保理债权多重让与情形下的对抗规则研究”(202310644)。
关键词
保理合同
债权转让
保理登记
债权分割
Factoring Contract
Credit Assignment
Factoring Registration
Credit Division
