期刊文献+

我国数字乡村研究现状、热点及演变趋势

The Current Situation,Hotspots and Evolutionary Trends of China's Digital Countryside Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 数字乡村是推动农民农村共同富裕的重大战略举措,也是农业农村现代化背景下乡村振兴的重要实现路径之一。目前,国内关于数字乡村的研究多集中在理论应用和指标体系等方面,尚未有基于文献计量学的可视化研究。文章以数字乡村为研究对象,以中国学术期刊出版总库为数据源,运用CiteSpace文献计量分析软件,对这1863篇文献进行研究热点及其趋势的可视化分析,以期为数字乡村未来研究方向提出合理的建议。 Digital countryside is the strategy for rural revitalisation and the key to building a digital China.At present,domestic research on digital villages focuses on several aspects such as theoretical applications and evaluation methods,while the research based on bibliometric methods to present the progress and characteristics of digital villages has not yet appeared.The article takes digital countryside as the research object,takes China General Library of Scholarly Journal Publications(CNKI)as the data source,and uses CiteSpace Bibliometric Analysis Software to carry out visual analysis of research hotspots and research trends of the 1863 documents,with a view to putting forward reasonable suggestions for the future direction of digital countryside research.
作者 邹仪
出处 《建筑与文化》 2024年第8期88-90,共3页 Architecture & Culture
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:42071159)。
关键词 数字乡村 研究热点 研究趋势 文献计量分析 digital countryside research hotspot research trend bibliometric analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献66

  • 1袁方,孟增辉,于戈.对k-means聚类算法的改进[J].计算机工程与应用,2004,40(36):177-178. 被引量:48
  • 2COLE F J, Hulme E W. The history of comparative anatomy-A statistical analysis of the literature [ J]. Science Progress, 1917 ( 11 ) : 578 - 596.
  • 3Lotka A J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1926,16(12) :317 - 323.
  • 4Gross P L K, Gross E M. College libraries and chemical education [ J]. Science, 1927, 66 (1713) :385 -389.
  • 5Bradford S C. Sources of information on specific subjects[J].Engineering, 1934, 137 : 85 - 86.
  • 6Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas [ J ]. Science, 1955, 122 ( 3159 ) : 108 -111.
  • 7Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[ J]. The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, 102 ( 46 ) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 8Seglen O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research [ J ]. BMJ, 1997,314 (7079) :497 - 502.
  • 9Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[ J]. Journal of the American Society for In- formation Science and Technology, 1973,24 (4) : 265 - 269.
  • 10Chen C. Generalised similarity analysis and pathfinder network scaling[ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 1998,10 (2) :107 -128.

共引文献1070

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部