摘要
为了解和掌握当前环境空气非甲烷总烃监测所使用的氮中甲烷气体标准物质的质量状况,通过对全国范围内开展环境空气非甲烷总烃监测的实验室中的99家进行使用情况调查,发现共涉及35家制造商。选择其中使用占比较高的10家,另外再随机选取6家,通过匿名采购等方式获取31瓶氮中甲烷气体标准物质。经两家测试单位分别测试后,采用归一化偏差(E_(n))法和相对偏差法两种方法评价所选标准物质的量值准确性和监测适用性,同时依照相关国家计量技术规范评估其证书完整性和规范性。结果显示,两种方法的评价结果一致。16家制造商中,14家的27瓶气体标准物质定值准确,2家的4瓶气体标准物质定值不准确;9家证书相对完整、规范,其余7家普遍存在缺少标准物质唯一标识等问题,部分制造商甚至存在涉嫌冒用证书、证书中的定值浓度超出认定范围等问题。鉴于氮中甲烷气体标准物质是保障非甲烷总烃监测结果准确性、可比性和可溯源性的重要基础,且制造商数量众多,建议使用者加强标准物质质量评估工作,并审查其所附证书的规范性。
In order to understand and grasp the quality status of methane(CH_(4)/N_(2))gas reference materials in nitrogen used for monitoring of non methane total hydrocarbons in ambient air,a survey was conducted on the use of 99 laboratories that have carried out monitoring of non methane total hydrocarbons in ambient air in China,and a total of 35 manufacturers were found to be involved.10 manufacturers with high usage were selected,and 6 manufacturers were randomly selected to obtain 31 bottles of methane gas reference materials through anonymous procurement.After being tested separately by two testing institutions,normalized deviation(E_(n))value method and relative deviation were used to evaluate the accuracy of their quantity values and applicability of monitoring.Meanwhile,the integrity and standardization of their certificates were evaluated according to relevant national standards.The results showed that the evaluation results of the two methods were consistent.Among the 16 manufacturers,14 manufacturers had accurate values of 27 bottles of sampled gas reference materials,and 2 manufacturers had inaccurate values of 4 bottles.The certificates of 9 manufacturers were relatively complete and standardized,and the other 7 manufacturers had problems such as lack of unique identification of reference materials,and some manufacturers even had problems such as suspected fraudulent use of certificates and fixed concentrations in certificates beyond the identification range.Given that CH_(4)/N_(2) gas reference materials are an important basis for the accuracy,comparability and traceability of non methane total hydrocarbon monitoring results,and that there are a large number of manufacturers,it is recommended that users strengthen the quality assessment of gas reference materials and review the prescriptibility of their accompanying certificates.
作者
王翀
吕怡兵
杨婧
谭铃
吴海
丁萌萌
杨静
王德发
李和通
马焕敏
WANG Chong;LYU Yibing;YANG Jing;TAN Ling;WU Hai;DING Mengmeng;YANG Jing;WANG Defa;LI Hetong;MA Huanmin(Zhengzhou Ecological Environment Monitoring Center,Zhengzhou 450007,China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Quality Control in Environmental Monitoring,China National Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100012,China;Chongqing Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center,Chongqing 401147,China;National Institute of Metrology,China,Beijing 100029,China;Beijing Municipal Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center,Beijing 100048,China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollutant Metrology and Reference Materials,Institute for Environmental Reference Materials of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Beijing 100029,China;CECEP Digital Intelligence(Beijing)Research Academy of Environmental Technology Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100070,China)
出处
《中国环境监测》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第4期30-36,共7页
Environmental Monitoring in China
关键词
环境空气监测
非甲烷总烃
气体标准物质
质量评估
ambient air monitoring
non methane total hydrocarbon
gas reference materials
quality assessment
