期刊文献+

红嘴鸥和喜鹊的粪便微生物群多样性比较研究

Comparative Study on the Fecal Microbiota Diversity of Black-Headed Gull and Magpie
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为评估不同种鸟类的病原体传播风险,提取红嘴鸥和喜鹊粪便的总DNA,通过PCR扩增16S rRNA序列V3~V4高变区,基于高通量测序和生物信息学研究两者肠道微生物群差异。研究结果显示,红嘴鸥和喜鹊粪便微生物群组成存在显著差异,两者粪便中最丰富的细菌门分别是厚壁菌门和变形菌门,前者粪便中绝对优势属是Catellicoccus(丰度均值65.5%)。红嘴鸥样本中均检测出弯曲杆菌属,检出率100%,丰度均值1.2%;喜鹊样本检出率55.6%,丰度均值0.019%。这表明,青岛市红嘴鸥种群广泛存在弯曲杆菌属,红嘴鸥的接触安全风险高于喜鹊。 Total DNA from fecal samples were extracted and the V3~V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA sequence was amplified to assess the potential risk of bird-to-human pathogen transmission in different bird species.Gut microbiota characterizations were determined with high-throughput sequencing and the followed bioinformatical analyses.The results show remarkable differences in the fecal microbiota between black-headed gulls and magpies.Firmicutes and Proteobacteria are the primary bacterial phyla in black-headed gull and magpie feces,respectively.Catellicoccus is the predominant genus in black-headed gull feces,and the average abundance is 65.5%.The detective rate of Campylobacter in black-headed gull feces is 100%,and the average abundance is 1.2%.But in magpie feces,the detective rate is 55.6%,and the average abundance is 0.019%.This suggests that Campylobacter is widespread in the population of black-headed gull in Qingdao,and the safety risk of exposure to black-headed gulls is higher than magpies.
作者 刘文轩 杨笑礼 李宗会 王斌 LIU Wen-xuan;YANG Xiao-li;LI Zong-hui;WANG Bin(School of Basic Medicine,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266000,China)
出处 《青岛大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2024年第3期15-20,26,共7页 Journal of Qingdao University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家重点研发计划(批准号:2018YFA0900802)资助 山东省重点研发计划(批准号:2019JZZY011009)资助 青岛市科技计划重点研发专项(批准号:20-2-3-4-nsh)资助。
关键词 红嘴鸥 喜鹊 肠道菌群 高通量测序 black-headed gull magpie intestinal microbiota high-throughput sequencing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献88

  • 1Drossman DA.The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process.Gastroenterology 2006; 130:1377-1390.
  • 2Hasler WL,Owyang C.Irritable bowel syndrome.In:Yamada T,ed.Textbook of Gastroenterology.2nd ed.Philadelphia:Lippincott,1995:1832-1855.
  • 3Dunlop SP,Jenkins D,Spiller RC.Distinctive clinical,psychological,and histological features of postinfective irritable bowel syndrome.Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:1578-1583.
  • 4Kim HS,Kim MS,Ji SW,Park H.[The development of irritable bowel syndrome after Shigella infection:3 year follow-up study] Korean J Gastroenterol 2006; 47:300-305.
  • 5Ilnyckyj A,Balachandra B,Elliott L,Choudhri S,Duerksen DR.Post-traveler's diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome:a prospective study.Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:596-599.
  • 6Rodríguez LA,Ruigómez A.Increased risk of irritable bowel syndrome after bacterial gastroenteritis:cohort study.BMJ 1999; 318:565-566.
  • 7Ruigómez A,García Rodríguez LA,Panés J.Risk of irritable bowel syndrome after an episode of bacterial gastroenteritis in general practice:influence of comorbidities.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5:465-469.
  • 8Soyturk M,Akpinar H,Gurler O,Pozio E,Sari I,Akar S,Akarsu M,Birlik M,Onen F,Akkoc N.Irritable bowel syndrome in persons who acquired trichinellosis.Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:1064-1069.
  • 9Piche T,Vanbiervliet G,Pipau FG,Dainese R,Hébuterne X,Rampal P,Collins SM.Low risk of irritable bowel syndrome after Clostridium difficile infection.Can J Gastroenterol 2007; 21:727-731.
  • 10Marshall JK,Thabane M,Borgaonkar MR,James C.Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome after a foodborne outbreak of acute gastroenteritis attributed to a viral pathogen.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5:457-460.

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部