摘要
对封建礼教意识形态的批判是晚清至民国时期文化思想变革的一个核心,而这个核心,实则演变自以《大学》“八目”即“格致诚正修齐治平”为基本结构的儒家道德政治学说,更确切地说,演变自由道德以说政治的基本进路。由此,在晚清“明道救世”背景下,人们对《大学》纲目的诠释由清中叶凌廷堪所谓“以礼代理”走向晚清时期的“礼理合流”;进而引起晚清至民国时期的一批知识分子对传统儒家之个人“私德”如何转化为现代社会之“公德”这一问题的探讨。也正是在此背景下,出现了以“党”为中介的思想观念,为新的社会公共空间的诞生建构了一个道德与政治的双重思想背景。
The criticism of the ideology of feudal ethics was a core aspect of the cultural and ideological transformation from the late Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China.This core actually evolved from the Confucian moral and political theory based on the"eight essential principles"of The Great Learning,namely"studying things,""acquiring knowledge,""being sincere in thought","rectifying one's mind,""cultivating oneself,""regulating one's family well,""governing the state properly,"and"bringing peace to all under heaven."More precisely,it evolved from the basic approach of using morality to discuss politics.Therefore,under the background of"understanding the principles of governing the world,and applying them to manage the real society"in the late Qing Dynasty,people's interpretation of the principles of The Great Learning shifted from Ling Tingkan's idea of"replacing reason with rites"in the middle of the Qing Dynasty to the"integration of rites and reason"in the late Qing Dynasty.This,in turn,led to a group of intellectuals from the late Qing Dynasty to the Republic of China discussing how traditional Confucian individual"private morality"could be transformed into social"public morality"in modern society.It was also under this background that the ideological concept of"party"emerged as an intermediary,constructing a dual ideological background of morality and politics for the birth of a new social public space.
作者
邹莹
ZOU Ying(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Xi'an International Studies University,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710128,China)
出处
《衡水学院学报》
2024年第5期101-107,共7页
Journal of Hengshui University
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(22YJC720026)
陕西省教育厅人文社会科学一般专项项目(22JK0161)
陕西省哲学社会科学重大理论与现实问题研究一般项目(2022HZZ1245)。
关键词
《大学》
礼理合流
个人私德
社会公德
“党”
The Great Learning
integration of rites and reason
individual private morality
social public morality
"party"