摘要
司法实践中网络服务提供者违反信息网络安全管理义务的事例屡见不鲜,但极少因此构成拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪,刑法义务的内涵不清晰是重要原因。本罪属于义务犯,信息网络安全管理义务根植于网络服务提供者的优势地位。网络服务提供者是“数字看门人”,参与网络犯罪治理满足治理需求,具备现实逻辑和可行依据。积极管理义务是本罪义务的实质内涵,可以具体化为内容管理义务、用户信息保护义务、犯罪防控义务和用户实名认证义务。通过对义务的明确和具体化,积极义务得到有限度的适用,以解决本罪“僵化”困境。
In judicial practice,it is common for network service providers to violate information network security management obligations,but rarely constitutes the crime of refusing to perform information network management obligations,which is due to the unclear connotation of criminal law obligations.This crime is obligation offense,and the information network security management obligations are rooted in the superior position of the network service providers.Network service providers are"digital watchdogs"who participate in cybercrime governance,which not only meets network governance needs,but also has realistic logic and feasible basis.The active obligation of information network security management is the essential connotation of the obligation of this crime,which can be embodied as the obligation of content management,user information protection obligation,crime prevention obligation and user real-name authentication obligation.Through clarification and specification of the obligations,positive obligations are applied to a limited extent to solve the"rigid"dilemma of this crime.
作者
杨宁
冷家伟
Yang Ning;Leng Jiawei(Law School,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)
出处
《中国海洋大学学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第5期93-103,共11页
Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“人机共驾模式下刑事责任问题研究”(20CFX026)。
关键词
拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪
信息网络安全管理义务
义务犯
crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management
obligation of information network security management
obligation offense
