摘要
在食药安全刑附民公益诉讼中,检察机关能否以及如何提起惩罚性赔偿,在理论上和实践中都存在较大争议。食药安全刑附民公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿呈现政策性文件支持导向明显,而法律中直接请求权规范缺失的现状。这导致在司法实践中审判机关对检察机关的惩罚性赔偿诉讼请求裁判不一。检察机关出于维护公共利益的目的和行使法律监督职能的要求,是提起惩罚性赔偿的适格主体。基于惩罚性赔偿的民事责任性质,惩罚性赔偿金不应与刑事罚金“竞合”,不应相互抵扣,应当缴付至专门公益基金以支持食药安全公益事业。
In the civil public interest litigation attached to criminal cases related to food and drug safety,there are great controversies in theory and practice about whether and how procuratorates can claim punitive damages.The legislative status quo of punitive damages in civil public interest litigation attached to criminal cases in food and drug safety is that the supporting orientation of policy documents is obvious,but the direct claim right norms are lacking in law,so that the courts have different judgments on the claim for punitive damages of procuratorates in judicial practice.In order to safeguard public interests and exercise the function of legal supervision,the procuratorates are the appropriate subjects to claim punitive damages.Based on the nature of civil liability of punitive damages,punitive damages should not be"concurrent"with criminal fines,should not be deducted from each other,and should be paid to a special public welfare fund to support the public welfare undertakings of food and drug safety.
作者
聂圣
袁佳煜
Nie Sheng;Yuan Jiayu(Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China;People’s Procuratorate of Ezhou City,Hubei Province,Ezhou 436000,China)
出处
《湖北警官学院学报》
2024年第4期114-124,共11页
Journal of Hubei University of Police
关键词
食药安全
刑附民公益诉讼
惩罚性赔偿
赔罚分离
Food and Drug Safety
Civil Public Interest Litigation Attached to Criminal Cases
Punitive Damages
Separation of Compensation and Punishment
