摘要
预防性环境民事公益诉讼的基本事实判断条件是“具有损害社会公共利益的重大风险”。“重大风险”的认定实质是基于对环境风险的法律评估,司法解释中虽然运用了“重大风险”的表述,但何为“重大风险”、界定“重大”之度并未作出详细解释。在司法实践过程中,判定风险内在本质,如何认定重大风险是否存在以及因果关系的证明均存在困境。因此,为破解现实难题,应明确和细化“重大风险”的内涵,探讨“重大”之度,规划“预防”之路。
The basic factual judgement condition in preventive environmental civil pubic interest litigation is the presence of"significant risks that could harm social public interests".The identification of"significant risk"is essentially based on the legal evaluation of environmental risk.Although the expression of"significant risk"is used in judicial interpretation,what is"significant risk"and the degree of defining"significant"are not explained in detail.In the process of judicial practice,there are difficulties in judging the inherent nature of risks,how to determine whether major risks exist and how to prove causality.Therefore,in order to solve the practical problem,we should clarify and refine the connotation of"major risk",explore the degree of"major"and plan the road of"prevention".
作者
毕力格图
丰瑞瑞
Bi Ligetu;Feng Ruirui(School of Humanities,Inner Mongolia University of Technology,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,010080,China)
出处
《牡丹江师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第3期26-32,39,共8页
Journal of Mudanjiang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
内蒙古自治区研究生教育教学改革研究项目“三全育人视域下法律硕士民法学课程思政研究与实践”(JGSZ2022024)。
关键词
环境风险
公益诉讼
重大风险
司法认定
environmental risks
significant risks
preventive environmental public interest litigation
judicial determination
