摘要
返还财产与折价补偿作为恢复原状的具体方式,其性质在理论上多有争议。返还财产请求权不论是采原物返还请求权说抑或不当得利请求权说还是请求权竞合说均有无法解释的缺陷,合同无效后财产返还制度与物权法、不当得利法所要实现的价值追求并不一致。折价补偿作为财产返还的补充形式,亦是如此。返还财产请求权以及折价补偿请求权应均是独立的请求权基础,均属于类合同请求权。
As specific ways of restitution,the nature of returning property and compensation for discounted price has many disputes in theory.There are some defects that cannot be explained no matter whether the claim for returning property adopts the theory of claim for returning the original object,the theory of unjust enrichment or the theory of concurrence of claims.The system of returning property after the invalidation of contract is inconsistent with the value pursuit of the Property Law and the Unjust Enrichment Law.As a supplementary form of returning property,compensation for discounted price is also the case.Both the claim for returning property and the claim for compensation for discounted price are independent claims and belong to quasi-contractual claims.
作者
彭玲
PENG Ling(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
关键词
合同无效
返还财产
折价补偿
请求权
invalid contract
return of property
compensation for discounted price
claim right
