期刊文献+

考虑不同人为因素的机坪碰撞风险动态评估方法

Dynamic Assessment Method for Apron Collision Risk Considering Different Human Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 机坪作业密度高、空间小,是碰撞事故的多发区。当前机坪碰撞风险评估模型并未考虑人为因素,针对此问题,提出一种考虑不同人为因素的机坪碰撞风险动态评估方法。在此基础上进行数据采集,分别计算车辆与车辆、车辆与航空器、航空器之间的碰撞风险并在其中探究不同人为因素的影响程度。实验结果表明:人为因素是机坪碰撞风险计算中不可忽略的重要因素;人员工作负荷相较于工作经验对碰撞风险影响的程度更大;滑行航空器相较推出航空器能够对机坪安全造成更大的威胁,建议在人员工作负荷较大时,适当延长安全距离有利于保障机坪运行安全。 Because of its high working density and narrow space,apron becomes the collision accident prone area.The current collision risk assessment model does not consider human factors.To solve this problem,a dynamic assessment method of apron collision risk incorporating different human factors was proposed to quantitatively calculate the collision risk of apron operation.Based on this method,the simulation experiments were carried out in combination with the actual operation of the airport.The experimental results show that human factor is an important factor that cannot be ignored in the calculation of apron collision risk.The impact of work load on collision risk is greater than that of work experience.Taxiing aircraft can pose a greater threat to apron safety than launching aircraft.It is suggested that when the personnel work load is large,the appropriate extension of the safety distance is conducive to ensuring the safety of the apron operation.
作者 孙菁源 邵荃 朱培 张靓 SUN Jing-yuan;SHAO Quan;ZHU Pei;ZHANG Liang(Civil Aviation College,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106,China;Chengdu Tianfu International Airport Branch,Sichuan Airport Group Co.,Ltd.,Chengdu 641400,China)
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2024年第28期12374-12381,共8页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(U2233208) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20201296)。
关键词 机坪运行 场面碰撞 轨迹预测 人为因素 apron operation scene collision trajectory prediction human factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献48

  • 1韩飞,张素民,刘嘉沂.基于眼椭圆的驾驶员后视镜视野盲区概率分布估计[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2013,43(S1):521-525. 被引量:9
  • 2刘建,郑双忠,邓云峰,李安贵,宋存义.基于G1法的应急能力评估指标权重的确定[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(1):30-33. 被引量:87
  • 3李连结,姚建刚,龙立波,院晓涛,李会杰.组合赋权法在电能质量模糊综合评价中的应用[J].电力系统自动化,2007,31(4):56-60. 被引量:145
  • 4张兆宁,张晓燕.交叉航路碰撞风险研究[J].航空计算技术,2007,37(2):1-4. 被引量:18
  • 5中国民航总局航空安全办公室.中国民航航空安全报告[R].2005.
  • 6ASA E, ROLAND A, MARCUS A, et al, Safety culture in Swedish air traffic control[J]. Safety Science, 2007, 45(7) : 791-811.
  • 7SALTER M B. SeMS and sensibility: security management systems and the management of risk in the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority [ J ]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2007, 13 (6) : 389-398.
  • 8ANDREW H. Risk contours and risk management criteria for safety at major airports with particular reference to the ease of Schlphol[ J ]. Safety Science, 2002, 40 (1) : 299-323.
  • 9MILAN J. An assessment of risk and safety in civil aviation [ J ]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2000, 6 ( 1 ) : 43-50.
  • 10中国民航总局航空安全办公室.民用机场航空安全评估系统[R].北京:中国民用航空总局,2000.

共引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部