期刊文献+

思维导图联合CBL在心血管疾病健康风险评估与干预教学中的应用效果评价

Effectiveness evaluation of mind mapping combined with case based learning in teaching cardiovascular disease health risk assessment and intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索思维导图联合CBL在心血管疾病健康风险评估与干预教学中的应用效果。方法试验组选取某医科大学2018级临床医学专业学生(一班)(n=80)采用思维导图联合CBL教学模式教学,对照组选取同校2018级临床医学专业学生(二班)(n=131)采用传统授课模式教学。通过随堂测验成绩和问卷调查的形式综合比较两种教学方法应用效果的优劣。结果与传统授课模式相比,思维导图联合CBL教学模式随堂测验成绩优于对照组(P<0.01);学习兴趣激发(P<0.05)、基础知识记忆水平(P<0.01)、培养逻辑思维分析能力(P<0.01)、临床问题解决能力(P<0.01)、汇报表述能力(P<0.01)、团队协作能力(P<0.01)六个方面综合教学效果评价均优于对照组;教学质量评价、学习过程评价、课程满意度评价、总体评价四个方面教学满意度均优于对照组(均P<0.01)。结论思维导图联合CBL教学模式在“心血管疾病健康风险评估与干预”教学可弥补传统授课模式学生学习积极性不足、对知识点框架结构模糊、理解及应用不足等缺点,有效提高教学效果。 AIM To explore the application effect of mind mapping combined with CBL in the teaching of cardiovascular disease health risk assessment and intervention.METHODS Eighty Grade 2018 students majoring in clinical medicine from a medical university were selected as the experiment group and mind mapping combined with case based learning(CBL)teaching mode was adopted,and 131 Grade 2018 students majoring in clinical medicine from the same university were selected as the control group and traditional lectures teaching mode was adopted.The advantages and disadvantages of the two teaching modes were comprehensively compared by in-class test scores and questionnaires.RESULTS The in-class test scores of the experiment group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.01),and the students of the experiment group were better than their counterparts of the control group in learning interest(P<0.05),basic knowledge learning(P<0.01),ability cultivation of logical thinking and analysis(P<0.01),clinical problems solving(P<0.01),reporting and presenting skills(P<0.01)and teamwork collaboration(P<0.01).The experiment group were more satisfied with teaching effect,teaching quality,learning process,and course evaluation than the control group(all P<0.01).CONCLUSION Mind mapping combined with CBL teaching mode in the teaching of"cardiovascular disease health risk assessment and intervention"can effectively improve the teaching effect by patching up the shortcomings of the traditional teaching mode,such as students’lack of motivation,vagueness about the framework of the knowledge points,and insufficient understanding and application.
作者 王钦 孙金海 沈晓兰 赵帅 杨丽 禹天同 高好考 李成祥 黄亚渝 廉坤 WANG Qin;SUN Jin-hai;SHEN Xiao-lan;ZHAO Shuai;YANG Li;YU Tian-tong;GAO Hao-kao;LI Cheng-xiang;HUANG Ya-yu;LIAN Kun(Department of Health Service,Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China;Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,Xijing Hospital,Air Force Medical University,Xi’an 710032,Shaanxi,China;Department of Internal Medicine,Xijing Hospital,Air Force Medical University,Xi’an 710032,Shaanxi,China)
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2024年第5期608-613,共6页 Chinese Heart Journal
基金 空军军医大学教学改革研究项目(KJJYDXYB015) 海军军医大学校级精品课程立项培育项目(JPKC2022ZD002) 海军军医大学校级教学成果培育项目(JPY2020A06)。
关键词 思维导图 CBL 心血管疾病 健康风险评估与干预 mind mapping CBL cardiovascular disease health risk assessment and intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献59

共引文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部