摘要
目的比较急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者在不同器械辅助支持下进行急诊经皮介入治疗术的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月期间在医院接受急诊经皮介入治疗术的急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者。根据患者接受的血流动力学支持方式,分为体外膜肺氧合联合主动脉球囊反搏(ECMO联合IABP)支持的研究组,以及单纯IABP支持的对照组。比较两组患者的临床预后差别。结果共有40例患者纳入研究,其中研究组11例,对照组29例。两组患者在基线资料如年龄、性别、合并症等方面无显著差异。相较于对照组,研究组的陈旧性心肌梗死发生率(5/11 vs.2/29,P=0.016)和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的发生率(8/11 vs.11/29,P=0.49)更高;研究组入院时左室射血分数更低[(38.5±10.10)vs.(48.55±8.86),P=0.01],EF值<35%的患者比例更多(5/11 vs.3/29,P=0.01);研究组的多支血管疾病率和Syntax评分也明显高于对照组(10/11 vs.11/29,P=0.02)和[(33.36±13.37)vs.(25.74±5.75),P=0.015];研究组完全血运重建的比例更高(9/11 vs.8/29,P=0.002);研究组器械辅助支持并发症的发生率较高(6/11 vs.5/29,P=0.02)。研究组的1年生存率明显高于对照组(91.00%vs.55.17%,P=0.03)。结论急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术时,ECMO联合IABP的器械辅助支持方式并发症相对较高,但更有利于完全血运重建,临床预后更好。
Objective To evaluate the effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with intraaortic balloon pump mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocar⁃dial infarction during PCI process.Methods Patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction who underwent PCI in the hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were selected.Those who were under support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with intra-aortic balloon pump were enrolled in the observation group,the patients under support of only intra-aortic balloon pump were selectedin the control group.The differ⁃ences of clinical features and prognosis were compared.Results A total of 40 patients were enrolled,11 were in the observation group and 29 in the control group.Compared with control group,more patients were complicated with old myocardial infarction(5/11 vs.2/29,P=0.016),more patients were diagnosed as non-ST elevated myocardial infarction(8/11 vs.11/29,P=0.049)and left ventricular ejecting fraction was lower[(38.5±10.10)vs.(48.55±8.86),P=0.01]in observation group.Moreover,the proportion of patients with EF<35%was higher in the observation group(5/11 vs.3/29,P=0.01).The observation group has significantly higher rates of multi-vessel disease and Syntax scores compared to the control group(multi-vessel disease:10/11 vs.11/29,P=0.02;Syntax score:[(33.36±13.37)vs.(25.74±5.75),P=0.015];the observation group exhibited a higher proportion of patients achieving complete revascularization(9/11 vs.8/29,P=0.002).Mechanical complications were higher in observation group(6/11 vs.5/29,P=0.02),The survive rate in observation group is higher than that in control group(91.00%vs.55.17%,P=0.03)at one-year follow-up.Conclusion Compared with only IABP,ECMO com⁃bined with IABP hemodynamic support during PCI process for patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction enjoys more complete revascularization and better mortality outcome,although it has rela⁃tively higher mechanical complications.
作者
罗明华
陈玉善
王贺
关怀敏
解金红
LUO Minghua;CHEN Yushan;WANG He;GUAN Huaimin;XIE Jinhong(Department of Cardiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of He′nan Univer-sity of Chinese Medicine,National Clinical Medical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases of Traditional Chi-nese Medicine Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of He′nan University of Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou 450000,He′nan,China)
出处
《实用医学杂志》
CAS
2024年第23期3317-3322,共6页
The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(编号:82274316)。
关键词
急性心肌梗死
心源性休克
体外膜肺氧合
主动脉球囊反搏
急诊经皮冠脉介入治疗术
器械辅助支持
acute myocardial infarction
cardiogenic shock
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
intra-aortic balloon pump
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
mechanical circulatory support
