摘要
布雷顿森林机构一直被视为国际金融体系的象征,在国际金融事务中发挥举足轻重的作用。但是,本轮金融危机的爆发凸显了机构保护金融稳定的不得力,使其再次遭受合法性赤字的指责。国际社会对布雷顿森林机构的批判主要集中在三个方面:组织程序的民主性、决策内容的公正性和问责路径的有效性,进而否定布雷顿森林机构管理行为的合法性。然而,在对合法性判断标准进行较为深入的分析后可以发现,布雷顿森林机构的合法性并非想象的那么脆弱,国际社会对它们某些方面的质疑过于片面。但不可否认的是,布雷顿森林机构仍存在一定程度的合法性赤字,需要采取相应措施加以完善,如增加发展中国家在机构中的代表性,提高决策机制的透明度和参与度,将机构规则具体化、法典化,填补布雷顿森林机构治理与成员国内部治理之间的断层,设立私人—国际金融机构争端解决机制。
The Bretton Woods Institutions are always regarded as the symbols of the international financial system,and play an important role in the international financial affairs.During the current financial crisis,the Institutions’incompetence in securing financial stability makes them face with the challenges of legitimacy deficit again.The international community criticizes its legitimacy mainly focused on three aspects,i.e.democracy in the organization procedure,justice in the content of decisions,and effectiveness in the accountability mechanism.However,based on the elaborate analysis of legitimacy standards,the legitimacy of the Bretton Woods Institutions is not as fragile as we thought and some criticisms are far from objective.It is undeniable that the legitimacy deficit does exist in the Bretton Woods Institutions and the international community should take necessary measures to improve it,such as enhancing the representation of developing countries in the Institutions;improving the transparency and participation of decisionmaking body;making the Institutions’rules specification and codification;filling the gap of governance between the Institutions and member states;establishing the Private-International Financial Institutions Dispute Settlement Mechanism.
作者
张晓静
张金矜
Zhang Xiaojing;Zhang Jinjin
出处
《国际关系与国际法学刊》
2016年第1期207-245,共39页
Journal of International Relations and International Law
基金
张晓静主持的中国博士后科学基金第五十四批(2013M541855)面上项目和第七批特别资助(2014T70610)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
布雷顿森林机构
全球治理
合法性
民主赤字
问责性
The Bretton Woods Institutions
Global Governance
Legitimacy
Democratic Deficit
Accountability
