摘要
本文选用了4种常用的基本模型、3种因素基准组合、9种市场指数和5种无风险收益率,组合成4×3×9×5=540种具体的基金业绩评价方法,用我国证券市场实际数据模拟的一系列随机投资组合代替实际基金,对这些基金业绩评价方法进行系统的模拟研究。研究结果表明,评价方法的选择对评价结论有着很大的影响。其中,不同的基本模型、基准组合和市场指数对评价结论具有较大影响,而无风险收益率的选择对评价结构影响较小。在此研究基础上,本文对我国证券投资基金的业绩评价结果进行了实证分析,并给出了运用方法方面的建议。
four models, three benchmark portfolios, nine market indexes and five risk-free rate of returns had been tested by 4×3×9×5=540 specific performance evaluation methods. The performance of actual mutual funds is simulated by random selection of portfolios from Chinese security market. The authors find that the evaluation results are rather method sensitive. Different substitute for fundamental models, benchmark portfolios and market indexes can lead to diverse conclusion of mutual fund performance. While test on varies risk-free rate of return display similar result. Further practical suggestions also presented on empirical research from Chinese mutual fund performance.
出处
《金融研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第12期38-48,共11页
Journal of Financial Research
