期刊文献+

中国农民抗争的策略与理据——“依法抗争”理论的两维分析 被引量:16

Strategy and Justification of Famers' Resistance in China: Two dimensional analysis of Rightful Resistance Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在近些年有关中国民众抗争政治的研究中,"依法抗争"理论极具竞争力,得到中外学界甚为广泛的认同。分析表明,"依法抗争"与其说是抗争的手法和策略,倒不如说是抗争的正当性理据。作为抗争的手法和策略,依法抗争存在内在的冲突,它既可能是非暴力的也可能是暴力的,既可能是合法的也可能是介于合法与非法之间的,未必是真正的"合法"。这种策略性抗争,难以说是真正的"依法抗争"。作为抗争的正当性理据,"依法抗争"恰当地突显了当今国家法律、政策和意识形态赋予民众抗争的正当性,及其在实际运行和执行中所存在的实际反差。对这些"法",不管内心信任与否,依法抗争者均可将其作为抗争行动的正当性理由。如果说在西方社会,权利已作为不证自明的普适性价值和伦理诉求,社会运动理论对抗争政治正当性理据的疏忽有其正当性,那么,在当今中国,当民众因社会情境尚需要极力正当化其抗争行动,理论研究就没有理由不关注包含伦理和道德情感的深层问题。 In recent years,'rightful resistance'is the most competitive theory and received widely response and approval in the study on contentious politics in China. This paper shows that 'Rightful resistance ' is more struggle justification than struggle strategy. As performance and tactics of contentious,the concept of 'rightful resistance 'has an inner conflict,because it not only may be nonviolence,but also violent,it not only may be legal,but also between legal and illegal,not necessarily true legitimate.This strategic struggle fall in between legal and illegal boundaries is hard to say that it is the truly rightful resistance. As legitimate justification of contentious, the concept of 'rightful resistance ' is very appropriate to highlight the current national laws,policies and ideologies gives the legitimacy of public protest,and show the contrast in the actual operation and implementation. For these'law',no matter whether the trust or not,all protesterstake it as a justification of the struggle. Because the concept of rights as a universal value and ethical demand is to be self-evident in the western society,western social movement theory neglect the legitimate justification of contentious have a rightful reason. In today's China,however,when people need make great efforts to justification them contentious action in social context,our theoretical research no reason not to focus on the deeper problems that include ethical and moral element.
作者 肖唐镖
出处 《河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第4期27-34 90,共9页 Journal of Hohai University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目(08AZZ005)
关键词 依法抗争 抗争手法 抗争理据 政治正当性 抗争政治 rightful resistance struggle strategy struggle justification political legitimacy contentious politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献54

共引文献288

同被引文献223

引证文献16

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部