摘要
在CGSS2006数据的基础上,使用回归分解技术,对东部和中西部人力资本、政治资本和社会资本对中国城市居民收入不平等的贡献作了比较。就人力资本对不平等的总影响而言,东部和中西部差别微小。其中教育程度的影响,发达地区要大于不发达地区;经验的影响则正好相反。社会资本的情况则相反,发达地区要小于不发达地区,但是,政治资本对不平等的影响是,发达地区要大于不发达地区。这些结果否定了收入不平等的市场一元论解释,认为市场和国家联合作用对收入不平等研究的解释力更强。
On the basis of CGSS2006 data, using Regression-based inequality decomposition technique,the paper compares the contribution of human capital,political capital and social capital on the income inequality of Chinese urban residents between the eastern and midwest.The total impact of human capital on inequality of china has slight difference. In which the level of education in the eastern affects income greater than midwestern. experienc is the opposite. Impact of social capital of midwestern urban resident on inequality, by contrast, is more than the eastern, but the impact of political capital on income inequality is greater than in the eastern. Refuting market monism of income inequality,this paper considers that the role of the market and the state all have impact on income inequality.
出处
《河海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2015年第4期42-47 90-91,共8页
Journal of Hohai University：Philosophy and Social Sciences
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(13YJA840007)
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(13JZD024)
国家社科基金项目(12CSH015)
江苏省哲学社会科学规划项目(13SHB006)
关键词
人力资本
政治资本
社会资本
收入不平等
回归分解技术
human capital
political capital
social capital
income inequality
regression decomposition technique
