摘要
自从以布伦特兰德夫人领导的委员会正式提出可持续发展概念以来,可持续发展受到社会各界的密切关注,可持续发展思想已经深入人心。但由于问题的复杂性,既使是今天,可持续的实现依然困难。因此,围绕可持续发展提出了各式各样的研究工具,其中可持续生计方法和脆弱性分析方法可谓是众多方法中的佼佼者。前者强调贫困的消除,后者强调脆弱性的缓解,可持续发展又是其共同的目的。本文对两种方法在概念和实施方案方面进行了比较分析,在明确它们的差异和相似之处的基础上,认为两种方法通过联合可以在实践中相互加强和相互促进。
Since The Brundtland Commission formally put forward the concept of sustainable development in their famous book Our Common Future, the global community has paid great attention to the principles of sustainable developmentHowever, the implementation of sustainable development is still difficult even today, because of its essential complexity Therefore, many research tools for sustainable development have emerged in the past two decadesAmong them are the Sustainable Livelihoods (SL) Approach and Vulnerability Analysis Approach, two analytical tools that can inform sustainable development proposalsThe first focuses on poverty alleviation and the second on mitigation of risks to shocks and stressesThis paper explores the role of these two frameworks in development planning and describes where they intersect and where they differThe first section describes and compares the conceptual and theoretical underpinnings of each approachThe second section describes how each framework operates in implementation, and how the two can reinforce each other in guiding analysis of constraints to and entry points for sustainable development projects
出处
《地理科学进展》
CSCD
北大核心
2003年第1期11-21,共11页
Progress in Geography
基金
中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KZCX1-6-2-6
KZCX1-10-07-04).
关键词
可持续发展
可持续生计
脆弱性分析
比较
Sustainable development
Sustainable livelihoods (SL)
Vulnerability analysis
Comparison
