期刊文献+

原型范畴理论与英汉构词对比 被引量:89

Prototype theory and differences of word-formation between English and Chinese
下载PDF
导出
摘要 原型范畴理论是认知语言学中的主要内容之一,对亚里士多德2000多年前的经典范畴理论作出了一系列的批判。英汉构词的差异性显示,笔者发现汉语常用"属加种差"的义类构词法,主要就是运用了表示基本范畴层次的概念来构词,这就使得汉语词具有明显的义类范畴标记,而英语构词缺乏这一明显特征,这也是英汉两民族对基本层次概念在构词功能上的认识差异所致。 The prototype theory is one of the most important topics in cognitive linguistics, which severely criticizes the classical theory of categories proposed by Aristotle more than 2000 years ago. Through the contrast of wordformation between English and Chinese, we can find the particular way of wordformation in Chinese-specific properties plus basic level terms-is actually a kind of the application of the prototype theory, thus making the Chinese words distinctively marked with the semantic category feature, which the English words do not often have. This is caused by the cognition of basic level of category of the two nations in wordformation. 
作者 王寅 李弘
出处 《四川外语学院学报》 2003年第3期135-140,共6页 Journal of Sichuan International Studies University
基金 国家哲学社会科学规划项目系列论文之一
关键词 认知语言学 原型范畴理论 基本范畴层次 英汉构词对比 cognitive linguistics prototype theory basic level of category word-formation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Lakoff, G. & Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh-The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought[M]. Basic Books, 1999.
  • 2王寅.认知语言学的哲学基础:体验哲学[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(2):82-89. 被引量:422
  • 3Rosch, E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 1975, (104): 92 - 233.
  • 4Taylor, John. Linguistic Categorization[M]. Oxford:OUP, 1989.
  • 5Rosch, E. Principles of categorization[A]. In Rosch, E. & B. Lloyd(eds.). Cognition and Categorization [ C ]. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,1978.27 - 48.
  • 6Langacker, R,W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar[M]. vol. I:Theoretical Prerequisites. Califomia:Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 7Lakoff, C. Women, Fire, and Dangerous 7hings : What Categories Reveal about the Mind [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1987.
  • 8Aitchison, J. Linguistics [M]. London:Hodder Headline Plc, 1999.
  • 9Labov, W. The boundaries of words and their meanings[A]. In Bailey,C.J.N. & Shuy, R.W. (eds.). New Ways of Analysing Variation in English[C]. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 1973, 340-373.
  • 10Berlin, B. & Kay, P. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality & Evolution[M]. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press, 1969.

二级参考文献33

  • 1杜文礼.语言的象似性探微[J].外国语文,1996,21(1):60-65. 被引量:119
  • 2沈家煊.句法的象似性问题[J].外语教学与研究,1993,25(1):2-8. 被引量:741
  • 3戴浩一,叶蜚声.以认知为基础的汉语功能语法刍议(上)[J].当代语言学,1990(4):21-27. 被引量:163
  • 4王寅,1999,《论语言符号象似性--对索绪尔任意说的挑战与补充》[M].北京:新华出版社.
  • 5Bolinger, 1977. Meaning and Form [M]. London:Longman.
  • 6Chafe, L. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Derrida, J. 1982. Margins of Philosophy [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 8Dixon, R. M.W. 1982. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? [M]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • 9Givón: T. 1989. Mind, Code and Context [M]. Hillsadale, NJ: Academic Press.
  • 10Givón: T. 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction [M]. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

共引文献423

同被引文献647

引证文献89

二级引证文献261

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部